Some sites claiming the 34.2 was also completed on the soft compound.f1316 wrote:That's interesting because - whilst it's possible they were using different fuel loads - it gives us an idea that there might be 5 to 6 tenths between the softs and supersofts.diemaster wrote:1.34.813 Hamilton on softs
1:34.263 Hamilton on supersofts
diemaster wrote:1.34.813 Hamilton on softs
1:34.263 Hamilton on supersofts
I couldn't see either on Autosport or on Sky Sports Live or on AMuS ticker about SuperSoft mentioned for Lewis' run. For his previous run of 1.34.813, it was mentioned as Soft.gray41 wrote:Some sites claiming the 34.2 was also completed on the soft compound.f1316 wrote:That's interesting because - whilst it's possible they were using different fuel loads - it gives us an idea that there might be 5 to 6 tenths between the softs and supersofts.diemaster wrote:1.34.813 Hamilton on softs
1:34.263 Hamilton on supersofts
skysport:turbof1 wrote:That could be any random picture. Confirmation from a journalist at the track would be nice.
No that's good for me. Because a picture is just a snapshot of the moment, it could be any random picture thrown in there. That's why I'd rather have confirmation from somebody at the track. Anyway, +1 from me!mix2mix wrote:skysport:turbof1 wrote:That could be any random picture. Confirmation from a journalist at the track would be nice.
February 21 2014 10:37 AM
Hamilton sets those times on the softs, throw the supersoft into the mix and he could shave a second off the lap, thats not even in race spec, the quali times for this season are looking representative last seasons, the race lap times might be slower due to fuel restrictions though.
which other proof you need?
link:http://www1.skysports.com/f1/news/12433 ... three-live
Which site is reporting it was super softs?diemaster wrote:1.34.813 Hamilton on softs
1:34.263 Hamilton on supersofts
autosprint reports possibily gearbox and data transmission problemserlik wrote:Not much track action from Ferrari... does anyone have some news?