Sorry yeah, that was the intention.Just_a_fan wrote:I have always held Webber blameless for that one. Or did you mean to ask WhiteBlue?
Sorry yeah, that was the intention.Just_a_fan wrote:I have always held Webber blameless for that one. Or did you mean to ask WhiteBlue?
But neither driver felt a collision, LH's wing was undamaged, and the video evidence (onboard) is inconclusive.andrew wrote:On the radio 5 commentary, Antony Davidson stated that it had to be the left front of Hamilton's wing as drivers had been running over the kerbs in the first corner all weekend and there had been no punctures.
I haven't seen one that showed anything in enough detail to be conclusive. Hamilton's wing did wobble so I'd guess there was a very slight contact, but it was clearly a racing incident rather than anything sinister. Vettel was just unlucky with the puncture, but from my point of view it was beautiful poetic justice.Shaddock wrote:But neither driver felt a collision, LH's wing was undamaged, and the video evidence (onboard) is inconclusive.andrew wrote:On the radio 5 commentary, Antony Davidson stated that it had to be the left front of Hamilton's wing as drivers had been running over the kerbs in the first corner all weekend and there had been no punctures.
Is there an overhead shot of the start that's knocking around?
It is possible if the end plate slices the tyre that Hamilton could get away with no damage. In Vettel's post race interview he did mention something about Hamilton in relation to his puncture but I can't remember exactly what he said. An overhead shot and/or a video link would be useful for this.Shaddock wrote:But neither driver felt a collision, LH's wing was undamaged, and the video evidence (onboard) is inconclusive.andrew wrote:On the radio 5 commentary, Antony Davidson stated that it had to be the left front of Hamilton's wing as drivers had been running over the kerbs in the first corner all weekend and there had been no punctures.
Is there an overhead shot of the start that's knocking around?
No, the way I saw it Hamilton didn't use the space to go to the inside of copse. Right rear tyre of Vettel made contact with his left front wing endplate. He later found damage there in parc ferme I read. Tyre had gone off the rim already 150 m further down the road if I saw it right in the replay.myurr wrote:Possibly weakened the tyre, which was further weakened with the run over the curb, and then disintegrated under load through the next sequence of corners?Just_a_fan wrote:Watching the onboard from Hamilton's car it certainly looks to have been from his front wing. There is an obvious puff of smoke. It must have been quite a soft touch though because Hamilton's wing didn't appear to shed any pieces.
Sorry to disagree there but Seb is under control as we can see from pic 1 to pic 2. He is turning in and not sliding straight. SutilShaddock wrote:The best way to describe the move was clumsy. Seb locks a wheel in the first shot and was lucky not to take both of them off.
It is but you shouldn't collide, leave that sort of racing to the touring car boys.andrew wrote:As for Vettel's pass on Sutil, there is nothing wrong with it at all. It was firm but fair and how passing should be done.
You mean Seb?Giblet wrote:Sutil braked too late and too hard as evidenced by the tire smoke. He pushed too hard to put his car there, and went in too hot. Clumsy overtaking as usual.
Shaddock wrote:You mean Seb?Giblet wrote:Sutil braked too late and too hard as evidenced by the tire smoke. He pushed too hard to put his car there, and went in too hot. Clumsy overtaking as usual.