IMHO Webber should never have allowed Alonso to get through where he did. Pretty poor really. That was the difference between second and third. Track position.zeph wrote:Why? I thought he had a good race today.Traction wrote:Webber useless.
I thought that was a rather ballsy move by Alonso, and I don't think Webber expected that; I know I didn't. There was contact, he lost a piece of his front wing, what else should he have done? Block and crash?munudeges wrote:IMHO Webber should never have allowed Alonso to get through where he did. Pretty poor really. That was the difference between second and third. Track position.zeph wrote:Why? I thought he had a good race today.Traction wrote:Webber useless.
Except he didn't – Vettel stopped bang in the middle of the 1 stop window.mikeerfol wrote:They said that they were just running to target, it was Vettel who had stopped too early because of a flat-spot after he locked the front-right at Turn 1.CHT wrote:Does anyone got an explanation for Alonso pit stop strategy? I actually thought its Ferrari's way of reminding Alonso who is the boss.
China actually rather proves the "rule" – while Hamilton wasn't passed on lap 1, it was extremely clear at that point that he was going to be passed, he just did a very good job of defending. He was still passed extremely early in the race.raymondu999 wrote:China? Spain?beelsebob wrote:I actually can't think of an exception other than silverstone, where there's fairly obvious force majore.
I didn't at any point say it was easy. I said it was a no brainer that on a 2 stop strategy, where the final stop is heavily delayed, it's a no brainer that a professional F1 driver is going to be extremely quick in the final stage of the race.munudeges wrote:Yer. What Hamilton and Raikkonen did was easy......beelsebob wrote:Agreed, this was purely two stop strategy playing out, it was a no brainer that they would be storming through the field at the end.
I think you're mad if you think you can do 40ish laps on a single set of medium tyres.SectorOne wrote:Damn... i really think Hamilton could have cut back on the pace once he was ahead of Rosberg and just bring it home, potentially lose 1-2-3 spots but still finish higher then this.
I really think you guys are reading too much into this. You're talking about two drivers driving on medium tyres that have to last 10-15 laps, up against people driving on hards, that have already done 15-20 laps, and need to do another 10-15. The hards are half a second slower to start with, they lose a tenth of pace every lap, it's not a surprise then that HAM and RAI were 1.5 seconds a lap faster than them, especially given that they could push 100%, because they didn't have to do a full (20-25 lap) stint on the mediums they were on.Absolutely bonkers race though from Hamilton and Raikkonen, great entertainment chasing through the field.
Overall it was one hell of a race even though the finger won.....again.. Red Bull are simply SUPERIOR in every single area.
I actually thought Webber was making it easy to help Alonso in the race as I find it hard to believe that Webber could be struggling in the same car that qualify 2nd around Monza and then make some dramatic recovery and pointless attempt to regain his position towards the end.mx_tifoso wrote:Not winning here is hard to digest for the engineers, mechanics and drivers. The guys in the suits in Maranello and Modena are affected but they still get paid and do not have direct influence on the track, just payroll and marketing, etc. Imo it doesn't matter if they cannot accept losing, since they have nothing to do with it. I care about the men on the war front.
And what Alonso did with Webber can be understood because they respect each other and know where the line is. People like Vettel and others would not know and end up in a dnf or serious carnage.