Page 260 of 264

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 27 Apr 2022, 10:02
by johnny comelately
J.A.W. wrote:
27 Apr 2022, 09:49
2023 iteration of Rotax/BRP/Ski-Doo 850 snowmobile, 180hp with (altitude compensation) turbo.

https://sledmagazine.com/ski-doo-pushes ... c-turbo-r/
This is a good expose of that little gem too:

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 19:46
by vorticism
J.A.W. wrote:
27 Apr 2022, 09:49
2023 iteration of Rotax/BRP/Ski-Doo 850 snowmobile, 180hp with (altitude compensation) turbo.

https://sledmagazine.com/ski-doo-pushes ... c-turbo-r/
The expansion chamber ahead of the turbine reminds me of Merc's exhaust headers.

Image

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 23:38
by johnny comelately
This may interest you then. As an example of some current 4 stroke MX ideas.
Image

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 00:08
by gruntguru
Stepped header primaries are becoming very common but the use on a turbo application is curious.

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 00:16
by vorticism
Helps evacuate the cylinder just as in a two stroke. Helps reduce power required for exhaust stroke. Also advantageous during wastegate open regime.

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 00:25
by J.A.W.
gruntguru wrote:
29 Apr 2022, 00:08
Stepped header primaries are becoming very common but the use on a turbo application is curious.
The Rotax/BRP/Ski-Doo 850 turbo has a 'Y' junction 2-into-1 header, & the attached expansion
chamber/diffuser cone pipe - has to be gas-pressure sealed - yet not fracture prone.

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 00:31
by gruntguru
Ahh interesting, thanks J.A.W. Does that layout (with or without turbo) function the same as one chamber per cylinder in terms of expansion chamber "supercharging".

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 00:51
by J.A.W.
gruntguru wrote:
29 Apr 2022, 00:31
Ahh interesting, thanks J.A.W. Does that layout (with or without turbo) function the same as one chamber per cylinder in terms of expansion chamber "supercharging".
With a 180 degree crankshaft 2-stroke, firing intervals allow for this expedient, but packaging/costs
trump max output/efficiency gains ultimately shown by running individual systems per cylinder.

A larger number of cylinders will allow closer combustion events & synergistic flows accordingly as
gas flow can be timed as continuous, or over-lapping (3 cyl 2-strokes = 6 cyl 4-strokes, pulse-wise).

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 05:46
by gruntguru
. . and of course wave supercharging becomes less important when you have a hair-dryer hanging off the side.

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 05:56
by johnny comelately
I always understood the step is to prevent the pressure wave going back into the engine.
We have used reverse cones with some success to achieve same .

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 06:33
by gruntguru
The two stroke "pipe" is designed for the pressure pulse to go back into the engine (the pulse contains fresh charge not exhaust gas).

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 07:04
by johnny comelately
gruntguru wrote:
29 Apr 2022, 06:33
The two stroke "pipe" is designed for the pressure pulse to go back into the engine (the pulse contains fresh charge not exhaust gas).
I meant the step on the 4 stroke pipes, a la F1 (at least the older NA ones), NASCAR etc

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 10:41
by J.A.W.
gruntguru wrote:
29 Apr 2022, 05:46
. . and of course wave supercharging becomes less important when you have a hair-dryer hanging off the side.
That's a bit of a 'curly one' gg, if its natural vs perm, (& don't get us started on H-peroxide additives)..

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 14:17
by vorticism
gruntguru wrote:
29 Apr 2022, 05:46
. . and of course wave supercharging becomes less important when you have a hair-dryer hanging off the side.
This would depend on the differential pressure between cylinder and turbine inlet. I assume never as extreme as venting to atmosphere directly, perhaps unless during WGO. Regardless, wave tuning should still be possible, pipe enlargement will lead to a pressure and velocity drop locally. Same for the 'supercharging' wave, maybe there is a small gain to minimizing crossflow beyond what is needed. Less compressor work.

Re: 2 stroke thread (with occasional F1 relevance!)

Posted: 02 May 2022, 13:14
by Pinger
From this:

Image

To this:

Image

No mention of why the turbo was relocated to the end of the pipe.