Yes but who changed the not-working onboard camer for a working wide angled camera after the crash?mclaren111 wrote:Wide Angled camera.
I hope you brought the time machine with you then.Juzh wrote:Hoping for a 1st lap pile up with both mercs in the mix.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/33374087Mercedes have discovered Hamilton's poor start in Austria was caused by a problem within the engine, which has now been identified and a fix put in place.
Hamilton said: "After the last race, Nico simulated what happened for me at the start and found a serious issue that could have affected us this weekend. That has now been rectified and improved."
Mercedes executive director technical Paddy Lowe said Hamilton's engine was not responding to him moving the throttle. Rosberg stalled the car when he was given the same issue in the test.
"We actually found Lewis had done an incredible job to manage it as well as he did," Lowe said. "Things could have been a lot worse."
Oops erhmmmnSectorOne wrote:I hope you brought the time machine with you then.Juzh wrote:Hoping for a 1st lap pile up with both mercs in the mix.
They changed the version for the third time and it took them two weeks? So that's how they test engines: "hey Nico we're not sure if it's a driver try this". Bweeee.. OK good news it's the engine, what a relief!Just_a_fan wrote:Interesting snippet regarding Hamilton's poor start:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/33374087Mercedes have discovered Hamilton's poor start in Austria was caused by a problem within the engine, which has now been identified and a fix put in place.
Hamilton said: "After the last race, Nico simulated what happened for me at the start and found a serious issue that could have affected us this weekend. That has now been rectified and improved."
Mercedes executive director technical Paddy Lowe said Hamilton's engine was not responding to him moving the throttle. Rosberg stalled the car when he was given the same issue in the test.
"We actually found Lewis had done an incredible job to manage it as well as he did," Lowe said. "Things could have been a lot worse."
Wrong thread?AnthonyG wrote:Mercedes a second ahead of the first follower.
oops, indeed, srry.3jawchuck wrote:Wrong thread?AnthonyG wrote:Mercedes a second ahead of the first follower.
I blame the mods for keeping the thread sticky.3jawchuck wrote:Wrong thread?AnthonyG wrote:Mercedes a second ahead of the first follower.
Do you work for Red Bull?Juzh wrote:I blame the mods for keeping the thread sticky.3jawchuck wrote:Wrong thread?AnthonyG wrote:Mercedes a second ahead of the first follower.