The only purpose I see is to take F1 to such a label that finally the viewers would get bored of this carefully manipulated racing and then call for a complete ban on motorsport. Go green. Save the environment!!bhallg2k wrote:Yep. And they throw off so many marbles that the racing line becomes a veritable tightrope.
EDIT: I'm not one who really thinks pit stops make or break the quality of racing. But I understand that many do. The Pirellis are a response to this group of people. I'd just rather see pit stops induced in a way that doesn't destroy any possibility of good, hard racing. Tire durability and marbles do just that.
And besides, what's efficient about carrying a full fuel load from the start?
Or it could just degrade at a constant rate. I don't mind that expired tyres are seconds off the pace - it's the abruptness that I dislike. Videos!!myurr wrote:I agree to an extent that the cliff is over the top, but there still needs to be a strong decline at some point
I think he would have because that was simply the nature of the risk he was taking, but I also think the marbles he encoutnered really killed the tyres he was on, preventing him from getting back past the Williams'. It was a shame, because I actually think he was on for a possible 4th, 6th at worst, without that.banibhusan wrote:I wonder whether Alonso would have really ran off track if not for those tyre marbles!!
Baddum-tish!raymondu999 wrote: but to leave crumbs all around the racetrack is rubbish.
I don't read it like that .libano wrote:Rosberg continued to enjoy a 0.5 second per lap advantage over MSC during the race which cannot be explained by a difference in DRS system as neither one of them could use it.
Gary Anderson says that MSC was keeping a consistent distance in front of Button - i.e. doing no more than necessary in order to minimise degredation. Rosberg was just going for it, which would explain the difference in lap time.blokkie wrote:I don't read it like that .libano wrote:Rosberg continued to enjoy a 0.5 second per lap advantage over MSC during the race which cannot be explained by a difference in DRS system as neither one of them could use it.
I had the impression MSC was keeping a consistant 3sec behind ROSB .. but not loosing 0.5 sec per lap .
Sorry I'm not catching the joke?Ral wrote:Baddum-tish!raymondu999 wrote: but to leave crumbs all around the racetrack is rubbish.
(sorry, couldn't resist).
Yes it did rather turn overturn stereotypes:SiLo wrote:Last 25 laps of that race were thrilling though, and watching Webber overtake Vettel had me laughing out loud
It's an easy trap to fall in to, think Alonso in Abu Dhabi 2010, where you worry too much about the car behind you. In both cases Webber pitted early and teams reacted to cover the undercut.SiLo wrote:I thought Mclaren would shadow Nico's strategy as try and put him under pressure with what should be a quicker car and drivers, but alas, they moved to a three stopper. I think Button would of been able to manage his tyres easily to have a go at Rosberg on pure pace.
Last 25 laps of that race were thrilling though, and watching Webber overtake Vettel had me laughing out loud