Surely a top team could turn this to their advantage by creating a B-team and using their abilty for unlimited testing.
Mclaren have probably got 30 mil in their vending machines at Paragon.
The fallacy of your thinking is highlighted by your frequent use of "simple" and "simply." No, it is NOT simple. Think it through, or read other posts more carefully and with an open mind.WhiteBlue wrote:The solution to one set of rules is quite simple. The rich teams decide to pocket a huge profit and join the budget cap club.
But if they stay with the present rules it is no problem either. The adjustments between classes will have to be made on a per race basis. The FIA can simply run a rolling data base of all lap times of the two classes and adjust the handicap or advantage on a dayly basis. So no huge performance gap between the classes can develop.
You are simply left with two classes of which one will have the chance to make huge profits and win the championship. The other will have just the chance to win and spend it all.
Agree completely. It appears we could end up with a 2-level F1. That goes against every thing F1 has always represented.You cannot have a sport with one potential winner and have two seperate rules to get to that point. Look at 2006 when STR had the V10s - no matter what happened everyone bitched about them until mid season when the V8s finally overtook on pure pace. And then you have the SEAT diesels in WTCC kicking everything's arse because the rules are slightly more favourable.
Governing body meddling to make things "equal" never works. One set of rules for all.
Absurd. "Kimi, instead of 20 million, how about we pay you 1 million and a piece of the team?"But Mosley also allows that drivers, along with other key personnel such as chief designers and team principals, could be shareholders in the teams they work for and could be paid dividends. So there may be pay cuts for the likes of Raikkonen and Hamilton, but the scale is hard to estimate.
I think he meant the "New" Indycar rules that should hit in 2011.ISLAMATRON wrote:donskar, you are crazy if you think iRL has money.
I will watch, but I sincerely doubt that Tony George and Company would submit to foreign rule (F1 regulations/FIA).ISLAMATRON wrote:watch and see... IRL will(I think they have already) DELAY THEIR RULES CHANGES AND ADOPT WHATEVER FORMULA THAT F1 will... that is every indication I am hearing from everybody I know in that industry.
no personal attack intended... i apologize. but the irl teams dont have any moneydonskar wrote:Thank you conceptual.
islamatron, I think conceptual has clearly pointed out which of us is "crazy."
Please engage brain before putting fingers to keys. We are all, IMHO, passionate about F1, and we have strongly held opinions. That's what makes this forum interesting and entertaining. But there is no place here and no excuse for personal insults
Ditto!Scotracer wrote:The entire thing is ruining my chances of ever working in F1 - what a sad time to be a graduate engineer
My choices for this year:PNSD wrote:Ditto!Scotracer wrote:The entire thing is ruining my chances of ever working in F1 - what a sad time to be a graduate engineer
I think to avoid coming out of uni is such a time if I can afford another course is in order lol!