What's actually better for cooling?

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

What's actually better for cooling?

Post

Would that be an intake, such as the sidepods, or an exhaust? Just out of curiosity :P
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: What's actually better for cooling?

Post

If you design a cooling system which features an air stream under the body shell of the car you have to provide a heat exchanger, access and exit for the air. So your question makes little sense without further explanation of the specifics that you want to know.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
Holm86
247
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: What's actually better for cooling?

Post

If you have an intake you also need a place for the intake air to exit. Otherwise the air won't flow.

So you need both.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: What's actually better for cooling?

Post

Ok that didn't turn out well. Let's say you have an intake and an exhaust already. You need to cool it more. Can you just stick on a bigger/more exhaust pipes? (I'm referring to the physics here, not the actual regulations) Or should you have a bigger intake instead? Let's say you could only choose between the two, and not both.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

Edis
Edis
59
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 16:58

Re: What's actually better for cooling?

Post

raymondu999 wrote:Ok that didn't turn out well. Let's say you have an intake and an exhaust already. You need to cool it more. Can you just stick on a bigger/more exhaust pipes? (I'm referring to the physics here, not the actual regulations) Or should you have a bigger intake instead? Let's say you could only choose between the two, and not both.
There is no simple answer here. What you need is a pressure difference in the cooling system; a lower pressure at the outlet than in the inlet. You can't just put a big air intake on the car and choke the flow in the outlet, or the other way around. You need a balanced approach. Mass flow in equals mass flow out.

riff_raff
riff_raff
132
Joined: 24 Dec 2004, 10:18

Re: What's actually better for cooling?

Post

As Edis implies, heat rejection in a liquid-to-air heat exchanger is all about relative temperatures and mass flows. If the air ducting is the only variable that you can adjust to increase your heat rejection rate, then you want to make whatever changes produce the greatest air mass flow improvements for the least weight and drag penalty.

A well designed duct has a minimum area at the inlet. Diffuses and slows the airflow gradually up to the heat exchanger core face, increasing it's pressure and density. Then gradually converges the hotter, more energetic airflow in the exit duct, reducing it's pressure and increasing its velocity, which provides an extractor effect across the exchanger core.

If you can only change the entry/exit area of the inlet or exhaust duct, a larger exhaust exit area would probably be my first choice.
"Q: How do you make a small fortune in racing?
A: Start with a large one!"