They already have Wehrlein so they have a line with Toto.
Or they go back to Ferrari and offer to take Leclerc.
I'm not going to say that isn't a possibility next year, but you've written exactly like anyone else who underestimates their competition, regardless of the current circumstances it's a fools move to guarantee something like that so far off.drunkf1fan wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 04:34He literally just said, we'll have a current spec engine... and it won't be a Honda. There is no one with any common sense who think Honda won't be the worst engine next year as well, they aren't going to suddenly hit a home run and everyone else is improving as well.
So either everyone is already thinking oh god, a Honda, why even bother next year we'll be even further back and we won't finish half the races we have done this year... or you tell everyone we won't be in that situation and soon we'll have a 2018 engine from Ferrari or Renault sorted for next year. If anyone can take that as bad news or bad for motivation, wow.
Reading Vasseur´s comments I guess they have an agreement with Ferrari to use a current version of the PU and not an old one.GhostF1 wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 01:46They've either been able to secure Merc or Ferrari 2018 PU's or AT MINIMAL have the starting of fruitful conversations behind the scenes, or in my opinion they've made a big mistake. We haven't got the full picture, it's starting to get quite late for next years development to begin and now with Honda out, if they have no concrete engine choice in sight, it's looking grim. In light of these events and what Vasseur has said, I expect the Ferrari relationship to continue but they'll move back up to current spec PU's. But they'll need to sort this out fast.
Why?
Fair enough, let's see what happens. They'd need certainty quick on this part.
As long as they don't have the funds, they wont be competitive. And with the Honda engine they'll probably get a lot more technical support as it is Honda's wish to make more km's with their engine, which certainly would be an advantage. I don't think Ferrari sends enough support staff to extract the maximum from the engine
Why would it be a guarantee that Honda would be the worst engine? While you're at it, can you tell me what I'll do in 2019?drunkf1fan wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 04:34He literally just said, we'll have a current spec engine... and it won't be a Honda. There is no one with any common sense who think Honda won't be the worst engine next year as well, they aren't going to suddenly hit a home run and everyone else is improving as well.
So either everyone is already thinking oh god, a Honda, why even bother next year we'll be even further back and we won't finish half the races we have done this year... or you tell everyone we won't be in that situation and soon we'll have a 2018 engine from Ferrari or Renault sorted for next year. If anyone can take that as bad news or bad for motivation, wow.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.ph ... d-of-hondaSauber will continue with Ferrari engines for the 2018 Formula 1 season after the collapse of its Honda deal.
Less than 24 hours after Sauber confirmed it would not be going through with its original plan of switching to Honda, it announced a new deal with current supplier Ferrari.
Sauber has had to use year-old Ferrari engines this season, but its new deal is for latest-specification power units.
Team principal Fred Vasseur said: "I am very pleased to confirm that we will continue to work with Scuderia Ferrari as our engine supplier in form of a multi-year agreement.
Quite a straight forward decision if you ask me.... 2018 Ferrari PU or 2018 Honda PU? Not much to considerSniffit wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 10:54http://www.autosport.com/news/report.ph ... d-of-hondaSauber will continue with Ferrari engines for the 2018 Formula 1 season after the collapse of its Honda deal.
Less than 24 hours after Sauber confirmed it would not be going through with its original plan of switching to Honda, it announced a new deal with current supplier Ferrari.
Sauber has had to use year-old Ferrari engines this season, but its new deal is for latest-specification power units.
Team principal Fred Vasseur said: "I am very pleased to confirm that we will continue to work with Scuderia Ferrari as our engine supplier in form of a multi-year agreement.
I agree, however I can see that Honda has more development potential due to the diminishing returns that the established manufacturers run in to. Also I would haev liked Sauber to run Hona just to get a more diverse field.Santozini wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 11:20Quite a straight forward decision if you ask me.... 2018 Ferrari PU or 2018 Honda PU? Not much to considerSniffit wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 10:54http://www.autosport.com/news/report.ph ... d-of-hondaSauber will continue with Ferrari engines for the 2018 Formula 1 season after the collapse of its Honda deal.
Less than 24 hours after Sauber confirmed it would not be going through with its original plan of switching to Honda, it announced a new deal with current supplier Ferrari.
Sauber has had to use year-old Ferrari engines this season, but its new deal is for latest-specification power units.
Team principal Fred Vasseur said: "I am very pleased to confirm that we will continue to work with Scuderia Ferrari as our engine supplier in form of a multi-year agreement.
Because IT IS the worst engine.wesley123 wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 10:52Why would it be a guarantee that Honda would be the worst engine? While you're at it, can you tell me what I'll do in 2019?drunkf1fan wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 04:34He literally just said, we'll have a current spec engine... and it won't be a Honda. There is no one with any common sense who think Honda won't be the worst engine next year as well, they aren't going to suddenly hit a home run and everyone else is improving as well.
So either everyone is already thinking oh god, a Honda, why even bother next year we'll be even further back and we won't finish half the races we have done this year... or you tell everyone we won't be in that situation and soon we'll have a 2018 engine from Ferrari or Renault sorted for next year. If anyone can take that as bad news or bad for motivation, wow.
The problem you are missing is that there is more to running the team than having an engine in the back. Ferrari, Renault and Mercedes have no interest in delivering engines to an extra team, whereas Honda does. This'll mean that they'll probably get a whole lot more technical support than they would get with the other manufacturers.
Sauber isn't very strong financially, and having a Mercedes, Ferrari or Renault engine in the back doesn't change anything to that. They'll receive an engine with which they have little experience, and have to allocate resources to extract the maximum from the engine, resources they do not have to spare. This is a large reason why they picked the 2016 Ferrari engine for this season; Certainty on the engine side, they knew the engine and its performance.
And considering the manufacturers at some point in the future Honda would consider a factory team of their own, which is where Sauber would be very available, which is something that would also benefit Longbow.
Honda would have given them the possibility to take a step forwards, with the other manufacturers they'd just stay in the same position they are in now, where they have literally no chance of being competitive as they dont have the resources to actually do anything.
If that isn't strong enough for you I really don't know what it is...
It is the worst engine? How can that ever be possible when the 2018 spec PU isn't even built?
I don't doubt the finances of Longbow, they have more than enough money. But the concern is if they are willing to actually invest in Sauber? Having the money and wanting to spend said money are two very different things. And considering how the owners are an investment firm, which in the end are just looking to make money, I have serious doubts with them actually wanting to cough up the money to be competitive.cramr wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 12:27If that isn't strong enough for you I really don't know what it is...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/csylt/2016 ... 91ba27f9b1
It's a safe presumption that it will be. Vasseur made the correct decision.wesley123 wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 19:46It is the worst engine? How can that ever be possible when the 2018 spec PU isn't even built?
Or are you assuming that the 2018 spec Honda PU will be the worst of the field because it is this year?
I don't doubt the finances of Longbow, they have more than enough money. But the concern is if they are willing to actually invest in Sauber? Having the money and wanting to spend said money are two very different things. And considering how the owners are an investment firm, which in the end are just looking to make money, I have serious doubts with them actually wanting to cough up the money to be competitive.cramr wrote: ↑28 Jul 2017, 12:27If that isn't strong enough for you I really don't know what it is...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/csylt/2016 ... 91ba27f9b1