You might want to take a step back off the ledge.Rodak wrote: ↑13 Mar 2020, 03:13This is all good and well, but with no income and no championship there will be no money distribution at the end of the year. Teams that depend on prize money to continue, and that's obviously the F1.5 teams, will not have the deep pockets to continue. Sponsors will not be happy that they get no exposure and might, justifiably, demand refunds.
This could very well be the end of F1 as we know it. Why would Mercedes, who will lose massive car sales because of the economic consequences of the virus, continue in F1? I wouldn't, it would make no sense. Liberty Media has huge interest payments to make because of their financed debt to purchase Bernie's baby ($6 billion or so?) and they will be hard pressed to meet those payments.
Probably the happiest people in this whole imbroglio will be the track owners who won't have to lose money each time they put on a race.
calm down and stop panicking, you're definately extremely overreacting.Rodak wrote: ↑13 Mar 2020, 07:34No, you might want to step back a bit; I don't like dismissive comments like you have made. You know nothing about me or my history in racing, so stop being demeaning. I'm not hyper-ventilating and certainly am not over reacting. Face the facts, this season is done; the coronavirus is a real issue. Teams that rely on prize money from Liberty Media will suffer.
Tell me why Mercedes should stay in this series; there have been hints they may leave but remain as engine suppliers. Would you, as a business, keep dumping millions of dollars into a F1 team when you knew there would not be a return on investment? They are not in the sport for the thrill of it, and not for reasons other than their bottom line.
So you take a deep breath and think this through as a business and stop being a condescending ass. Formula One is not a sport, it's a business.
You may have a point here...Rodak wrote: ↑13 Mar 2020, 07:34
Tell me why Mercedes should stay in this series; there have been hints they may leave but remain as engine suppliers. Would you, as a business, keep dumping millions of dollars into a F1 team when you knew there would not be a return on investment? They are not in the sport for the thrill of it, and not for reasons other than their bottom line.
.... Formula One is not a sport, it's a business.
They've proven they can produce a race winning PU. A championship would be nice, but it's not as bad as the noughtiesbosyber wrote: ↑13 Mar 2020, 10:38On the other hand, Honda, while they felt they had to withdraw last time, also felt it was a defeat; added to that the difficult McLaren years and them only now feeling competent and capable of being competitive, they have something to prove both on the race track and off it.
It's not abandonment, it's a logical business decision. HPP could still supply PU's, if the series still exists...Mercedes is in a different situation, but to be seen to abandon a series over something like this, I don't think that would be a great PR image for them either.
I disagree. The fact they can't market their product isn't their fault.Red Bull, well, they might, but it would still look like throwing toys out of the pram as they can clearly afford it; I don't think that they would go.
Clearly, we will have to see how the year goes, and it might be very tough for quite a few teams...
Another reason to defer the rule change to 2022. It's not fair for the small teams.CFD stuff can be done from home, I suspect; and with presumably less testing, it will be freed up a bit - might very well be redirected to 2021.