No problem, I love pedantic peopleJust_a_fan wrote: ↑06 Sep 2019, 13:18Being pedantic, they're not low downforce aero packages, they're low drag aero packages.
But thanks for the pictures.![]()
![]()
Let's put it this way; At Monza you want to cut drag, but not cut downforce. At Monaco you want to gain downforce, but not drag.CLKGTR wrote: ↑06 Sep 2019, 13:22No problem, I love pedantic peopleJust_a_fan wrote: ↑06 Sep 2019, 13:18Being pedantic, they're not low downforce aero packages, they're low drag aero packages.
But thanks for the pictures.![]()
![]()
But on the other side - is Monaco aero package then high drag package? Or high downforce, as high downforce is desirable there, just as low drag at Monza? I guess you wanna say to use the term which describes what they are trying to achieve with that particular package...
at this point, it's Seb 216, Valtteri 213, Lewis 206. So it looks like a wet setup back-to-back with dry
You could put a vertical board in place of the rear wing. It would very low (zero) downforce but no use at Monza as it's very high drag. If they wanted low downforce then they'd fit a smaller diffuser as well as a smaller frontal area rear wing.CLKGTR wrote: ↑06 Sep 2019, 13:22No problem, I love pedantic peopleJust_a_fan wrote: ↑06 Sep 2019, 13:18Being pedantic, they're not low downforce aero packages, they're low drag aero packages.
But thanks for the pictures.![]()
![]()
But on the other side - is Monaco aero package then high drag package? Or high downforce, as high downforce is desirable there, just as low drag at Monza? I guess you wanna say to use the term which describes what they are trying to achieve with that particular package...
Serration cityzibby43 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2019, 23:34This is definitely new: *double* serration going on - serrated edge on the main plane and on the back of the flap.
via AMuS
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EDx4hLxWwAY ... ame=medium