#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
It seems that this FW concept was the better decision after all. All other teams copied it sooner or later. Redbull being the last ones which have tested it.
Well, the ones that "copied" it really went for a mid way solution, not a full Ferrari copy. Ferrari had a big inboard loading from the outset, Mercedes and RB kept more loading outboard even when they moved away from their original design. They also ran with more camber in the outer section that Ferrari - again keeping loading outboard.
It seemed to me, they still had a major downforce-deficit in the last three races. My guess is they will converge to the Mercedes/Red Bull solution of the FW.
Maybe they dailed down their downforce to maintain their straight line advantage, as it seem they lost some power after the engine directive FIA statedSingapore2008 wrote: ↑04 Dec 2019, 16:43It seemed to me, they still had a major downforce-deficit in the last three races. My guess is they will converge to the Mercedes/Red Bull solution of the FW.
First of all, totally contrary to what Singapore2008 told, Ferrari had the best cornering performance of all season in 2 of the last 3 races.Holm86 wrote: ↑04 Dec 2019, 17:27Maybe they dailed down their downforce to maintain their straight line advantage, as it seem they lost some power after the engine directive FIA statedSingapore2008 wrote: ↑04 Dec 2019, 16:43It seemed to me, they still had a major downforce-deficit in the last three races. My guess is they will converge to the Mercedes/Red Bull solution of the FW.
Mercedes seems to be playing a "have their cake and eat it too" game, they use a lot of surface but have a small dip to help outwash.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑04 Dec 2019, 15:59Well, the ones that "copied" it really went for a mid way solution, not a full Ferrari copy. Ferrari had a big inboard loading from the outset, Mercedes and RB kept more loading outboard even when they moved away from their original design. They also ran with more camber in the outer section that Ferrari - again keeping loading outboard.
It will be interesting to see if Ferrari converge with Merc/RB or whether they converge towards the Ferrari solution.
Well, I didn't expect the lack of downforce on this years Ferrari to be questioned and I certainly didn't want to revive the discussion about the TD's. So, let me put it antoher way.LM10 wrote: ↑04 Dec 2019, 17:43First of all, totally contrary to what Singapore2008 told, Ferrari had the best cornering performance of all season in 2 of the last 3 races.Holm86 wrote: ↑04 Dec 2019, 17:27Maybe they dailed down their downforce to maintain their straight line advantage, as it seem they lost some power after the engine directive FIA statedSingapore2008 wrote: ↑04 Dec 2019, 16:43
It seemed to me, they still had a major downforce-deficit in the last three races. My guess is they will converge to the Mercedes/Red Bull solution of the FW.
Secondly, it didn’t look like they cut off some downforce as they had maximum rearwing configuration in all 3 races. Would be a bit weird to try to cut downforce and still let the most drag producing device on the car.
I think a shrink-wrapped style engine cover à la Mercedes could unlock some performance at the rear.godlameroso wrote: ↑05 Dec 2019, 17:28The downforce will come from a redesigned bargeboard area, and improved power unit packaging.