of course not. I just though that maybe there were design differences between the chassis.bar555 wrote:I am not a psycho-magician to read the chassis number from the picture .
of course not. I just though that maybe there were design differences between the chassis.bar555 wrote:I am not a psycho-magician to read the chassis number from the picture .
Rear wing with that curved main profile was not used during the race, just in the practice. See middle pics in my last post: There is practice version along with race one.bar555 wrote:[
REAR WING - BELGIUM
There was a horizontal plate linking the two vertical pillars in Spa . Moreover the main profile was raised more in its central section , a solution offering no only less downforce, but also much less drag compared to the previous configuration
Rear wing with that curved main profile was not used during the race, just in the practice. See middle pics in my last post: There is practice version along with race one.bar555 wrote:[
REAR WING - BELGIUM
There was a horizontal plate linking the two vertical pillars in Spa . Moreover the main profile was raised more in its central section , a solution offering no only less downforce, but also much less drag compared to the previous configuration
Pedro wrote:Rear wing with that curved main profile was not used during the race, just in the practice. See middle pics in my last post: There is practice version along with race one.bar555 wrote:[
REAR WING - BELGIUM
There was a horizontal plate linking the two vertical pillars in Spa . Moreover the main profile was raised more in its central section , a solution offering no only less downforce, but also much less drag compared to the previous configuration
OK, sorry bar555! I think my fault was I did not stress that, it was just on the pic. Peacebar555 wrote:Pedro wrote:Rear wing with that curved main profile was not used during the race, just in the practice. See middle pics in my last post: There is practice version along with race one.bar555 wrote:[
REAR WING - BELGIUM
There was a horizontal plate linking the two vertical pillars in Spa . Moreover the main profile was raised more in its central section , a solution offering no only less downforce, but also much less drag compared to the previous configuration
I neglected to mention that this was the tested version because you have already mentioned it a post before . I just wanted to quote the main differences ....
When I have a look at your posts Bar555 I do look to try and find something you haven't seen but I never do. I think it's looked at alot and is definetly liked.bar555 wrote:Peace .... what peace ? Were me and you in a war and didn't realise it ?
Here is what i think : finding an error means that my work is liked and therefore being under notice . No errors-corrections by other members would mean two things to me . The first one that my piece of work is perfect or secondly that no one pays serious attention on it .
I never claimed to be the perfect man and it is nice to see another mad man like me to focus on technical stuff
roost89 wrote:When I have a look at your posts Bar555 I do look to try and find something you haven't seen but I never do. I think it's looked at alot and is definetly liked.bar555 wrote:Peace .... what peace ? Were me and you in a war and didn't realise it ?
Here is what i think : finding an error means that my work is liked and therefore being under notice . No errors-corrections by other members would mean two things to me . The first one that my piece of work is perfect or secondly that no one pays serious attention on it .
I never claimed to be the perfect man and it is nice to see another mad man like me to focus on technical stuff
Quality posting
x3TRICKLE69 wrote:roost89 wrote: When I have a look at your posts Bar555 I do look to try and find something you haven't seen but I never do. I think it's looked at alot and is definetly liked.
Quality posting
X2... It is liked very much!