Lewis retired from the lead three times in 2012, none of which his fault. In the space of the three years Jenson never retired from the lead, he did retire from second in Monza 2012.LionKing wrote:sennafan24 wrote: As for the DNF of Lewis having 13 and Button having 8:
Button: 6 mechanical issues and 2 accidents (which he was complete victim in both),
Lewis: 5 mechanical and 8 accidents/crash.
(Actually 2 of those Button's and 1 of those Lewis'es retirement can be considered strategic retirement as they chose to retire when they are out of points). The difference of DNFs comes from accidents.
2011 example of Micheal and Nico I think highlights their qualifying and race performances being quite different.
In 2012, Hulky, Pastor and Romain were at fault for crashes that caused Lewis to retire. James Allen estimates that Lewis lost a staggering 110 points in 2012 due to pure bad luck, whilst Vettel, ALonso and Button all lost about 30/40. With the swing (points lost/gained by retirements) and with all things being equal in luck Lewis would have won the title. Maybe Alonso was better that year as he played with a car that was not as good as Lewis's arguably. But, Vettel enjoyed a better car and team most weekends, not always in terms of speed but in terms of reliability and efficency.
So with the strategic failures being equal if you are saying Jenson did it twice and Lewis once, the mechanical failures are fairly equal but they cost Lewis a lot more due to him retiring from more valuable positions.
You may have a point in 2011 that race and qualifying were a different story, but 2012 Lewis was better in both. Over the three years Lewis's bad luck cost him more than Jenson's bad luck. Yes, Lewis did cause himself more crashes in the space of the three years and was more reckless, but he also got shunted out more times than Jenson through no fault of his own.