donskar wrote:A question I sincerely hope some off you will answer after considering it:
If every driver in the field had a Brawn, who would win most consistently?
In order... "complete driver"
1 Alonso
2 Trulli, yes, Jarno, very complete, race craft, quali, car development
3 LH, say what you will he did very good against FA when it was all new to him
4 JB I held this view before now. renowned smoothness, 2004 + 2006 season
5 SV (not complete yet, he tossed Melbourne needlessly)
6 FM really grew last year, very complete driver, quiet and loyal, developer
7/8 NR/RK maybe RK/NR (both deserve better cars)
9 RB (more complete than Kimi because of superior feedback and car development)
10 Kimi (no more fire in the belly, very sad, Monaco reminded us of what once was)
11 MW (quickly becoming mediocre, has acknowledged bad luck)
12 NH (finished races, sneaky fast, holds his own against RK just fine)
13 TG
14 HK
15 KN
16 Buemi (maybe a future star but not close to "complete" yet)
17 Sutil
18 GF (would have rated him as high as 5th in 2003, give DiGrassi his seat)
19 Bourdais
20 Piquet (name only, Hockenheim '08 was a fluke when the stars aligned and he didn't mess it up.)
In order... win consistently in a Brawn
1 Alonso
2 Trulli
3 LH
4 JB
5 SV
6 FM
7 RK
8 Kimi (you can't unlearn somethings)
9 NR
10 MW
11 NH
12 RB
13 TG
14 Buemi
15 GF (fast car would revive him)
16 HK
17 Sutil
18 KN
19 Bourdais
20 Piquet
Innovation over refinement is the prefered path to performance. -- Get rid of the dopey regs in F1