https://the-race.com/formula-1/williams ... 2026-deal/
Could be good news for McLaren if they want to go get a works deal again…..
Sounds positive however There is an understanding among the experts that McLaren has the weakest car at the moment.mclaren111 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2023, 10:28@TheMcLarenZone:
Sounds Positive...Mclaren’s James Key insists the #MCL60 is not as bad as has been claimed, after all it’s not like they have to “attack” some “crazy characteristic”, they just need more “grip”.
Can't think of any races since at least 2018 where practice has given any actual indication of where in the pecking order McLaren would be. But then again, I'm also just a pleb, lol.
See AR3-GP's post below. It's not about what you draw from a race, it's about where you finish. McLaren seem positive about future updates. Other teams will also have updates. There's no reason to believe the McLaren updates will be any better than the teams around them. We shall see.Ground Effect wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 17:32The team literally said they drew positives from Lando’s race pace. Surely they would take into account all caveats? Things aren’t so bad that they don’t know what they’re talking about.RS200E wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 05:12Yeah the optimism drawn from Lando's stints are unfounded unfortunately.continuum16 wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 17:31
For clarity and objectivity purposes:
He completed 55 laps:
18 of them on used softs (most likely from qualifying, so max. 3 laps, albeit at least one at full push)
37 on new rubber, various compounds
He was actually not on used rubber most of the race. They had 4 sets of new tires. If the last stint was the one where he kept up with the leaders (I think it was), it was on an 8-lap stint on used softs (presumably not more than 3 laps old when they put them on), compared to ~25 lap stint on hards from those in front.
McLaren are struggling. Are any other teams bringing updates between now and Baku?