Eric Blandin leaving was what hit Mercedes but mike should have learned enough from him
What if the zeropods was baldin design?
Daimler's relationship with AML is arms length at best and the possible 20% stake is also conditional (yet to materialise).F1Krof wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 23:14You got a good point. This is what I've been saying since last year basically. You're as good as the weakest member of the team. Merc is being run by interns and rushed seniors. I explained back in few posts. I've been working in different corporations and I saw this happening in each of the corporations I worked. It's almost impossible to hold tight the talent. You gotta to always bring and be in hunting mode of fresher talent, otherwise they'll hunt your most valuable experienced personnel and you'll be running the departments with interns and inexperienced personnel being in charge of very complicated situations with a huge degree of pressure. And it's almost like a downward spiral, the more you try the more the staff will run away.Mattchu wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 20:30Do people not realize that Daimler AG (Mercedes parent company) have a large holding in Aston Martin Lagonda PLC. Tobias Moers, the ex head of AMG Mercedes is now CEO of Aston!
Merc have had their run in F1 and all the publicity that goes with it, the "brand" the bigwigs are pushing now is Aston Martin as can be seen by the safety car changes and factory/people investment.
If you think it`s all Lawrence Stroll behind this, think again, the full weight of the parent company is behind Aston and not the team that carries its name but is two thirds owned by Ineos and Wolff.
They`re now pretty much just another team making up the numbers, in my opinion Aston Martin will take their place in the top three and when the next concorde agreement comes round, just before the new engine regs (2026) I wouldn`t be surprised if the team gets sold or Daimler pull out completely.
The top engineers/people aren`t there anymore and haven`t been for a few years, Think Cowell(engine), Costa(design+engineering), Vowles(Srategy), Braun(Technical),Lowe (good with suspension), Lauda(all round good egg). James Allison steping back a bit and being replaced with Elliot can`t have helped either, I really don`t get a good F1 vibe off the bloke, he seems nice enough though, maybe that`s half the problem!
You said all concepts are significantly faster than the RB18. Last I checked being overweight isn’t part of anyone’s concept. It’s just a simple fact that if you account for weight then your statement doesn’t hold true, which carries some pretty dire implications for Merc.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 23:50According to the timing boards it is true. Sure you can slice and dice it and give additional reasons, but im just looking at the stopwatch. I agree the time difference is coming from something.Cs98 wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 23:04Accounting for weight that is definitely not true. The RB18 at the weight limit would’ve smoked the W14 the way it performed here. Even the base spec from early 2022, which was 15+ kg overweight.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 01:07
Whats easy to forget is that all concepts are significantly faster than RB last year, so the reference has moved and that has not become apparent until now. Also gaps in qualy were relatively small. It seems like RB seems to have a much better understanding of how to work the tires.
Weight is for sure related to a concept. THe other important thing you are leaving out is that the floor area was cut down and the ride height was raised. Even with those additional limitations the Merc was faster than last years RB18. Can't just pick one thing out. The W14 probably looked good in the windtunnel until the RB19 and AM turned it up in Q3.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 13:00You said all concepts are significantly faster than the RB18. Last I checked being overweight isn’t part of anyone’s concept. It’s just a simple fact that if you account for weight then your statement doesn’t hold true, which carries some pretty dire implications for Merc.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 23:50According to the timing boards it is true. Sure you can slice and dice it and give additional reasons, but im just looking at the stopwatch. I agree the time difference is coming from something.
It sure isn’t when that same concept is now at the weight limit and every other team bar one was also overweight. It was a consequence of the regulations, not any one concept within those regulations.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 15:01Weight is for sure related to a concept.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 13:00You said all concepts are significantly faster than the RB18. Last I checked being overweight isn’t part of anyone’s concept. It’s just a simple fact that if you account for weight then your statement doesn’t hold true, which carries some pretty dire implications for Merc.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 23:50
According to the timing boards it is true. Sure you can slice and dice it and give additional reasons, but im just looking at the stopwatch. I agree the time difference is coming from something.
It is, because they did not have the resources to do it. Only now, without majorly changing the car they are able to do it.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 15:07It sure isn’t when that same concept is now at the weight limit and every other team bar one was also overweight. It was a consequence of the regulations, not any one concept within those regulations. The Alfa purposely went with a short wheel base for example to save weight.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 15:01Weight is for sure related to a concept.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 13:00
You said all concepts are significantly faster than the RB18. Last I checked being overweight isn’t part of anyone’s concept. It’s just a simple fact that if you account for weight then your statement doesn’t hold true, which carries some pretty dire implications for Merc.
Concept and the construction composits are two different things. Lack of capacity or development work or R&D for newer and lighter composits, to reduce the weight, due to cost cap, isn't the problem of concept. It's the external factors that are limiting the concept. As soon as they got the budget from 2022, they could reduce the weight and concept didn't create hurdles for reducing it.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 15:22It is, because they did not have the resources to do it. Only now, without majorly changing the car they are able to do it.
Anyway long story, but the Merc was faster in Q3 than last years RB. Slice or dice it the way you want. The car gained alot of pace and engineers were fooled. Likely by their own rule they advocated for. Raising the floor edge (as you like) 15mm and losing alot of reference.
isn't that even more concerning if the W14 looks good to mercedes and it's still 1s off?napoleon1981 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 15:01Weight is for sure related to a concept. THe other important thing you are leaving out is that the floor area was cut down and the ride height was raised. Even with those additional limitations the Merc was faster than last years RB18. Can't just pick one thing out. The W14 probably looked good in the windtunnel until the RB19 and AM turned it up in Q3.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 13:00You said all concepts are significantly faster than the RB18. Last I checked being overweight isn’t part of anyone’s concept. It’s just a simple fact that if you account for weight then your statement doesn’t hold true, which carries some pretty dire implications for Merc.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑06 Mar 2023, 23:50
According to the timing boards it is true. Sure you can slice and dice it and give additional reasons, but im just looking at the stopwatch. I agree the time difference is coming from something.
no they knew where they would bezakhassan44 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 16:23isn't that even more concerning if the W14 looks good to mercedes and it's still 1s off?napoleon1981 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 15:01Weight is for sure related to a concept. THe other important thing you are leaving out is that the floor area was cut down and the ride height was raised. Even with those additional limitations the Merc was faster than last years RB18. Can't just pick one thing out. The W14 probably looked good in the windtunnel until the RB19 and AM turned it up in Q3.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 13:00
You said all concepts are significantly faster than the RB18. Last I checked being overweight isn’t part of anyone’s concept. It’s just a simple fact that if you account for weight then your statement doesn’t hold true, which carries some pretty dire implications for Merc.
doesn't that just mean that there's a cap on both ferrari's and merc's concepts relative to red bull's?Venturiation wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 16:46no they knew where they would bezakhassan44 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 16:23isn't that even more concerning if the W14 looks good to mercedes and it's still 1s off?napoleon1981 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 15:01
Weight is for sure related to a concept. THe other important thing you are leaving out is that the floor area was cut down and the ride height was raised. Even with those additional limitations the Merc was faster than last years RB18. Can't just pick one thing out. The W14 probably looked good in the windtunnel until the RB19 and AM turned it up in Q3.
ferrari is having the same problem as W13 ; the simulator says the car is 1 second faster but on track it isn't
it's either that or redbull is using something that the others haven't learned yet wich explains aston martin jump after dan fallows brought his RB18 and 19 knowledgezakhassan44 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 17:06doesn't that just mean that there's a cap on both ferrari's and merc's concepts relative to red bull's?Venturiation wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 16:46no they knew where they would bezakhassan44 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 16:23
isn't that even more concerning if the W14 looks good to mercedes and it's still 1s off?
ferrari is having the same problem as W13 ; the simulator says the car is 1 second faster but on track it isn't
Yep, probably this is it. I think they know a trick or two about ground effect which the others don't at the moment. Jury's out let's hope for a RB or AM stoppage on track and see what they're hiding under the skirt literally. I think there's where the secret lies.Venturiation wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 17:09it's either that or redbull is using something that the others haven't learned yet wich explains aston martin jump after dan fallows brought his RB18 and 19 knowledgezakhassan44 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 17:06doesn't that just mean that there's a cap on both ferrari's and merc's concepts relative to red bull's?Venturiation wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 16:46
no they knew where they would be
ferrari is having the same problem as W13 ; the simulator says the car is 1 second faster but on track it isn't
if teams are desperate they can just have contact with one of the cars so it's stuck on track and has to be liftedF1Krof wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 17:33Yep, probably this is it. I think they know a trick or two about ground effect which the others don't at the moment. Jury's out let's hope for a RB or AM stoppage on track and see what they're hiding under the skirt literally. I think there's where the secret lies.Venturiation wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 17:09it's either that or redbull is using something that the others haven't learned yet wich explains aston martin jump after dan fallows brought his RB18 and 19 knowledgezakhassan44 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 17:06
doesn't that just mean that there's a cap on both ferrari's and merc's concepts relative to red bull's?
Who is Baldin?Venturiation wrote: ↑07 Mar 2023, 01:04Eric Baldin leaving was what hit Mercedes but mike should have learned enough from him
What if the zeropods was baldin design?