Well whoever it was i'm glad they did it will hopefully bring the field in closer and cause a few moments of wheel on wheel action rather than massive gaps..raymondu999 wrote:I'd say a Ferrari one snitched on the Merc and Renault lumps. Cosworth isn't really competing with them
you make it sound like Ferrari already admit defeat even before the season begins.Hail22 wrote:Well whoever it was i'm glad they did it will hopefully bring the field in closer and cause a few moments of wheel on wheel action rather than massive gaps..raymondu999 wrote:I'd say a Ferrari one snitched on the Merc and Renault lumps. Cosworth isn't really competing with them
If true then I wonder why such a big rake of the car (almost biggest). I thought that engen maping helps with that concept. If they are weak on that department, why the rake then?CHT wrote:you make it sound like Ferrari already admit defeat even before the season begins.Hail22 wrote:Well whoever it was i'm glad they did it will hopefully bring the field in closer and cause a few moments of wheel on wheel action rather than massive gaps..raymondu999 wrote:I'd say a Ferrari one snitched on the Merc and Renault lumps. Cosworth isn't really competing with them
Not all teams have mastered Cold blowing/Off throttle blowing including Force India.CHT wrote:you make it sound like Ferrari already admit defeat even before the season begins.Hail22 wrote:Well whoever it was i'm glad they did it will hopefully bring the field in closer and cause a few moments of wheel on wheel action rather than massive gaps..raymondu999 wrote:I'd say a Ferrari one snitched on the Merc and Renault lumps. Cosworth isn't really competing with them
And what happened post Valencia.“There is no accepted universal definition of what constitutes a map or a mode, but we draw a general distinction between a ‘mode’ and ‘mix’ settings: what the question refers to as a ‘map’ we would refer to as a
‘mode’, and what the question calls a ‘mode’ we would call ‘mix settings’.
Generally we accept that by “mode” we mean a broad description of a regime under which we run the engine. This defines the philosophy of ignition mapping, fuelling and the distribution of fuel cut strategies used to
achieve the torque that the driver demands. This is what the teams were no
longer allowed to change between qualifying and the race in Valencia.
Engine “mix” settings are detail changes to fuelling that are routinely
used during the race to reposition ourselves on the curve between fuel
consumption and engine power.”
So to my mind, teams have circumvented the rule by using aggressive "modes" under the guise of "reposition ourselves on the curve between fuelconsumption and engine power."“Crucially, because all teams now use a common engine management system, there are limitations as to what any team can change with the car on-track, and these are only the engine “mix” settings. Fundamental changes to engine “modes”, where teams may chose to put aggressive or fuel-inefficient strategies into their cars for qualifying, can no longer be made for the race with the car in the garage or by the driver on-track.”
I doubt that this will happen. Blowing effects this year will by no means have a significance similar to last year. Furthermore, Renault has provided evidence that cold blowing is necessary to cool the engine. Should the FIA ban this now completely, they'd have to let Renault work on the engines in order to improve reliability.Hail22 wrote:Not all teams have mastered Cold blowing/Off throttle blowing including Force India.
This will help make all the teams bunch up together and higher intensity battles instead of *bblrrrrpppphhhttt* through the corner giving some speed and Vettel or Macca stays up front with no Challenge. Better to be a more compacted field instead of spread out...
Well FIA have instructed that it will go into affect before the Australia GP, i think there needs to be evidence of it to be seen as "cooling" instead of Renault jumping up and down saying so.Mandrake wrote:
I doubt that this will happen. Blowing effects this year will by no means have a significance similar to last year. Furthermore, Renault has provided evidence that cold blowing is necessary to cool the engine. Should the FIA ban this now completely, they'd have to let Renault work on the engines in order to improve reliability.
And only to remind you, Silverstone '11 wasn't any closer than the other races last season
*Offtopic: How the hell did you manage to get 200+ Posts in just 2 weeks o.O
I prefer the year of Retarded Retards Retarding.tjaeger wrote:Makes me wonder. Who observed that the RB was still sounding like retarding the engine? Did someone not observe that early on?
Which other cars sounded like doing it? All Merc engine cars? And all RB ones?
Here we go the year of the 'Retardgate'.
And this is exactly where the reliability card will be played again, from Renault's side. IMHO.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:@banibhusan
If the loop hole is shut, Renault will have to change to a previous spec engine not designed to spill excessive exhaust gasses to "cool" the engine.