The leading edge of the cape is raised to give more air mass for the cape to work. This is also done on the leading edge of the floor. The other benefit is as you say, the leading edge creates a high pressure zone, the pressure aft of the leading edge stabilizes and is joined by free stream air and continues to follow the curvature of the cape creating a high pressure along the top side, means the net pressure under the cape is negative, but only enough to create a vortex, this vortex has to go under the floor.trinidefender wrote: ↑08 Oct 2020, 16:25The front of the cape acts like leading edge root extensions (LERX) in some military jets.
It creates its own vortex to push the airflow where it's needed (as referenced in the BBC article). There is a definite downward angle throughout the cape with the steepest section being right at the front. This generates a high pressure region at the bottom of the leading edge of the cape and a low pressure region at the top. The airflow then rolls around from the high pressure side to the low pressure side creating a vortex. This exact method was pioneered in combat aircraft to keep flow attached at very high angles of attack the control the airflow.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/fi ... f18_46.jpg
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/pl ... x-cfd1.jpg
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/pl ... x-cfd2.jpg
With the accompanying article about LERX here: http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/q0176.shtml
We've had a cape since last year. It was just designed a bit differently that the new one. It started off between the FW mounting pillars at the base of the nose instead of how it is now with the mounting pillars close togetherCjC wrote: ↑09 Oct 2020, 10:24Yea when you look at that Renault cape it’s fair to say ours is very underdeveloped.
It seems to me the best direction within these current aero regs is to make use of a cape.
There’s an arguement to be made that we were the fastest un-caped car when you consider Merc, Red bull, racing points and Ricanult are faster packages with the capes they had from pre season testing
The cape goes back even further than that with the other nose we had back in the first year with Renault.trinidefender wrote: ↑09 Oct 2020, 12:13We've had a cape since last year. It was just designed a bit differently that the new one. It started off between the FW mounting pillars at the base of the nose instead of how it is now with the mounting pillars close togetherCjC wrote: ↑09 Oct 2020, 10:24Yea when you look at that Renault cape it’s fair to say ours is very underdeveloped.
It seems to me the best direction within these current aero regs is to make use of a cape.
There’s an arguement to be made that we were the fastest un-caped car when you consider Merc, Red bull, racing points and Ricanult are faster packages with the capes they had from pre season testing
Your are right we did. I meant the slim nose, narrow mounting pillars.trinidefender wrote: ↑09 Oct 2020, 12:13We've had a cape since last year. It was just designed a bit differently that the new one. It started off between the FW mounting pillars at the base of the nose instead of how it is now with the mounting pillars close togetherCjC wrote: ↑09 Oct 2020, 10:24Yea when you look at that Renault cape it’s fair to say ours is very underdeveloped.
It seems to me the best direction within these current aero regs is to make use of a cape.
There’s an arguement to be made that we were the fastest un-caped car when you consider Merc, Red bull, racing points and Ricanult are faster packages with the capes they had from pre season testing
Reads like Willem Toet.godlameroso wrote: ↑08 Oct 2020, 14:09https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/51739796
This article is from an actual F1 aerodynamicist.
"One of the first features that the y250 vortex starts to interact with is either the cape, or the J vane, depending on which is fitted.
Now, remember all the air is rotating around the y250 vortex. This is driving air downwards in the middle of the car.
This air hits the edge of the cape or J vane and creates a second vortex, this time rotating in the opposite direction.
This new vortex is absolutely key to the aerodynamics of the whole car.
The reason for this is that the next thing it does is go under the floor. Here, it triggers something a bit like a chain reaction."
I think it is raised simply becuase that's the direction of air flow on the surface of the nose. If you kook at the flow-viz you will see how it aligns.godlameroso wrote: ↑08 Oct 2020, 18:39The leading edge of the cape is raised to give more air mass for the cape to work. This is also done on the leading edge of the floor. The other benefit is as you say, the leading edge creates a high pressure zone, the pressure aft of the leading edge stabilizes and is joined by free stream air and continues to follow the curvature of the cape creating a high pressure along the top side, means the net pressure under the cape is negative, but only enough to create a vortex, this vortex has to go under the floor.trinidefender wrote: ↑08 Oct 2020, 16:25The front of the cape acts like leading edge root extensions (LERX) in some military jets.
It creates its own vortex to push the airflow where it's needed (as referenced in the BBC article). There is a definite downward angle throughout the cape with the steepest section being right at the front. This generates a high pressure region at the bottom of the leading edge of the cape and a low pressure region at the top. The airflow then rolls around from the high pressure side to the low pressure side creating a vortex. This exact method was pioneered in combat aircraft to keep flow attached at very high angles of attack the control the airflow.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/fi ... f18_46.jpg
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/pl ... x-cfd1.jpg
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/pl ... x-cfd2.jpg
With the accompanying article about LERX here: http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/q0176.shtml
Like nyeeaa
https://i.ma.ga/CTAfZ.jpg