Indianapolis 2005. 14 of 20 cars retired during the parade lap, which is defined as being part of the race.Per wrote:Good question, I think 2003 Brazilian GP.Alexgtt wrote:When was the last time we saw half the field retire from a race?
Indianapolis 2005. 14 of 20 cars retired during the parade lap, which is defined as being part of the race.Per wrote:Good question, I think 2003 Brazilian GP.Alexgtt wrote:When was the last time we saw half the field retire from a race?
yeah, that was one hell of a race, Schumacher got a free win and Alonso still won the championshipWillerZ wrote:Indianapolis 2005. 14 of 20 cars retired during the parade lap, which is defined as being part of the race.Per wrote:Good question, I think 2003 Brazilian GP.Alexgtt wrote:When was the last time we saw half the field retire from a race?
What regulation do you think it breaks to use any other air intake?Per wrote:Can you think of any other source that complies with regulations and makes sense from an aerodynamic point of view?
Not saying if it breaks the regulation, but here it is for others to look at.beelsebob wrote:What regulation do you think it breaks to use any other air intake?Per wrote:Can you think of any other source that complies with regulations and makes sense from an aerodynamic point of view?
Yes the rule gives some play and it has been discussed at length some weeks ago on this forum.Then the general consensus was that the intake would keep its usual position in the roll hoop for all teams; just today looking at the picture Owen posted I could not see the engine intake duct (or space for it).beelsebob wrote: Who says the roll hoop is used as the air source for the engine?
I'm not saying nor implying anything along that line; I'm asking you if you have any sensible idea of where the air intake could be if it is not in the roll hoop.beelsebob wrote:What regulation do you think it breaks to use any other air intake?Per wrote:Can you think of any other source that complies with regulations and makes sense from an aerodynamic point of view?
STR is using it for the engine's oil radsshelly wrote: edit: maybe the intake is in the opening below the air sccop for example - not too unconventional, but stll a novelty as rbr used that inlet for gbox rad cooling on rb9 and str are using it for the intercooler this year
No, as it stops the suspension having a single cross section.delsando wrote:Is it allowed to perforate the bell shape suspension wing to reduce drag and allow more air into the area up and behind diffuser to make it more effective?
something like this....i know it's supposed to be symmetrically, its just a concept
http://i60.tinypic.com/20hrha8.jpg
Is it permitted to blow behind the suspension bell wing to induce more negative pressure.