we don´t know what these chaps did actually agree ,do we ? I´m sure they did not put up a logo etc on their website without permission ...okay its not ferrari that butxpensive wrote:It's of course old-geezer-school this, but I think my employer would have appreciated to be asked politely if they wished
to become a partner, before just being appointed to it after that I had met someone at a show?
Anyway, any news on the rumoured involvement in USF1 by the France-family?
I honestly wish that I could write something different here, but if you scroll back this thread to page one, you will realize that this forum had it's share of healthy scepticism from day one, indeed from our US-based members at that.Chaparral wrote:Crikeys more posts are we at page 100 yet - for gods sake nothing is or has been forthcoming from USF1 get a grip guys - Im sure you'd be laying everything that your doing with your brand new F1 effort out to public view I do know however it is all being documented on film for release later or so Im told
While I appreciate what seems to be a compliment about how I have predominantly posted in this thread, I honestly would love to see the team make the grid, in the best interests of the sport.Giblet wrote:I have been saying this about once every 5 pages since it started. It's one thing to doubt in the way Fil is doubting, with information from suppliers who are concerned..
I had rather assumed that the promised "Late November roller" had been delayed because of some problem with the tub, or other specific part, but production of other components had carried on according to plan. Now it seems that there was very little manufacturing done last year.And the first chassis – top, bottom and nose – sits upon the Bay Cast flat plate in the R&D shop; it looks gorgeous. Soon we will be fitting all the electrical components, spring/damper units and suspension arms; the front and rear wing main planes are nearly finished and over in California Kenny Hill and Gordon Kimble are not too far away from completing the first batches of axles, hubs and bearing clusters.
Lets see what Weismann say in reply to my email, I will crosscheck with Anne if I can.xpensive wrote:Are you certain of this Weisman connection for USF1 scarbs, when their website says nothing about it?
http://www.weismann.net/
Weisman innovated the quickshift technology of todays f1 gearboxes ...so actually his knowledge came into F1 thru his involvement in williams-Honda and then Mclaren -Honda as far as i know .....they were also involved in the gearbox design for the Mclaren F1 street car a few years ago... so again old schoolscarbs wrote:Source: http://paddocktalk.com/news/html/module ... sid=125867
It seems USF1 are going to make their own gearbox with Weismann, also based near them in North Carolina. Weismann are well known for gearboxes, Gordon Murray used them at Brabham and again at McLaren (the mp4/4 Senna\Prost car). While innovative, they haven’t been in F1 since then (twenty years?). I suspect they will try something new with the gearbox in terms of shaft layout and shifting mechanisms. The other new teams are using the Xtrac gearbox and case, supplied as a package with the Cosworth engine.
Equally their CFD partner Corvid is new to F1 and single seaters, their motorsport experience being mainly Nascar and Corvette GT cars. The rest of their business being aerospace and defence, thus they may lack the background in cars with significant underbody downforce and in close proximity to the ground. The CFD results cannot be correlated to wind tunnel testing until the full car appears in the windshear tunnel. This isn’t likely to be until late January.
On the plus side they are working with JRI for dampers, Run by Jeff Ryan (the JR in JRI) he worked at Fox and latterly Penske shocks, so has an immense amount of knowledge of F1 and single seater (indycar) dampers.