What doesn't matter?PlatinumZealot wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 02:31Doesnt matter. We know that Hamilton amd Alonso have two very different driving styles, but they are the two most adaptable drivers on the grid. Naturally both of them drive the same car, the setups and the way to drive that car will be midway between what those two drivers prefer.
Yes I remember that and I believe Alonso beat Hamilton in Q2 that season.raymondu999 wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 10:44Q2 was always the balls-out flat-out session back then. Low fuel, new tyres... etc.
Can we remember who was the rookie that season?Wass85 wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 11:58Yes I remember that and I believe Alonso beat Hamilton in Q2 that season.raymondu999 wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 10:44Q2 was always the balls-out flat-out session back then. Low fuel, new tyres... etc.
God knows where the rubbish that he's not the fastest in qualifying comes from?
Oh yes certainly but you just can't say Hamilton won the qualifying battle when in fact Alonso did.Just_a_fan wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 12:36Can we remember who was the rookie that season?Wass85 wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 11:58Yes I remember that and I believe Alonso beat Hamilton in Q2 that season.raymondu999 wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 10:44Q2 was always the balls-out flat-out session back then. Low fuel, new tyres... etc.
God knows where the rubbish that he's not the fastest in qualifying comes from?
Well, "the qualifying battle" isn't just who did better in Q2 is it? It's about the positions on the grid at the start of the race too. And in that regard, Hamilton did beat Alonso.Wass85 wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 12:49Oh yes certainly but you just can't say Hamilton won the qualifying battle when in fact Alonso did.
It's debatable whether Hamilton would have got faster over one lap with more experience.
You know as well as I do that I you're running heavier than your teammate chances are you will be outqualified. Of course mistakes and such can make a difference but the whole point of going for it in Q2 is so you have the optimum strategy in the race.Just_a_fan wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 15:05Well, "the qualifying battle" isn't just who did better in Q2 is it? It's about the positions on the grid at the start of the race too. And in that regard, Hamilton did beat Alonso.
As for not getting faster with experience - really? You think that what a driver brings in on day one of his F1 career is all he'll ever have? Wow.
So Hamilton gained experience from testing but Alonso didn't? Come on, you can do better than that.Wass85 wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 16:39You know as well as I do that I you're running heavier than your teammate chances are you will be outqualified. Of course mistakes and such can make a difference but the whole point of going for it in Q2 is so you have the optimum strategy in the race.Just_a_fan wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 15:05Well, "the qualifying battle" isn't just who did better in Q2 is it? It's about the positions on the grid at the start of the race too. And in that regard, Hamilton did beat Alonso.
As for not getting faster with experience - really? You think that what a driver brings in on day one of his F1 career is all he'll ever have? Wow.
That I'm not sure sure, I mean he will have had plenty of experience in the car by time they started racing and let's not forget Alonso was with a new time too and had was used to the Michelin tyres at Renault.
Stop putting words in to my mouth.Just_a_fan wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 17:29So Hamilton gained experience from testing but Alonso didn't? Come on, you can do better than that.Wass85 wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 16:39You know as well as I do that I you're running heavier than your teammate chances are you will be outqualified. Of course mistakes and such can make a difference but the whole point of going for it in Q2 is so you have the optimum strategy in the race.Just_a_fan wrote: β17 Apr 2020, 15:05
Well, "the qualifying battle" isn't just who did better in Q2 is it? It's about the positions on the grid at the start of the race too. And in that regard, Hamilton did beat Alonso.
As for not getting faster with experience - really? You think that what a driver brings in on day one of his F1 career is all he'll ever have? Wow.
That I'm not sure sure, I mean he will have had plenty of experience in the car by time they started racing and let's not forget Alonso was with a new time too and had was used to the Michelin tyres at Renault.
So Alonso chose, and the team (that supposedly hated him) let him follow, the quickest race strategy? Fair enough if that's the case. Seems strange that the team that hated him so much allowed him to do such a thing...
Source - https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/arti ... hAmS2.htmlIt was then, when Schumacher tested both a V10 mule car and V12 Ferrari 412 T2, that Bernard understood his driving style, as the German preferred the V12, which had more engine braking β a feature which Gerhard Berger and Jean Alesi disliked as it would unsettle the car during off-throttle periods.
βI tried to speak to Michael and put across my viewpoint,β explained Bernard. β'For me, the way the car is quick is if you can plant the back end, if I can give you maximum traction at the back at all times, you can open the throttle sooner and you will be quicker.β
βNow, Michael didn't didn't drive like that. Michael drove what I call 'off the front of the car'. He wanted a front end [where he could] absolutely just turn the wheel and bang, into the corner and he would kind of look after the back.
βAll the other guys said: 'we don't like that, because when we do that the back end comes out'.β
I watched the 2007 Chinese GP yesterday. Alonso was at least 3 laps heavier than Hamilton, I did read he was 4 laps heavier.raymondu999 wrote: β14 Apr 2020, 23:03IIRC they were only ever 1lap apart on Q3 fuel weights. Could be wrong. To my memory, whoever was faster in Q2 got the extra lap of fuel in Q3?
Also dont forget differing setups. Just because they had the same car wouldnt mean same setups.
And so was born the idea that Schumacher wanted an oversteering car. He didn't want it to oversteer, it's just that he was comfortable looking after the back end so long as the front went where he wanted it to. I remember an interview with Irvine where he was trying to get the team to give him more front end. They kept trying to stop him because it would be more than Michael had and everyone thought that he liked lots of oversteer so Irvine's car would be undriveable. But Irvine wanted a really responsive front end, hated understeer with a passion.raymondu999 wrote: β18 Apr 2020, 06:09
βNow, Michael didn't didn't drive like that. Michael drove what I call 'off the front of the car'. He wanted a front end [where he could] absolutely just turn the wheel and bang, into the corner and he would kind of look after the back.