I'm sure Mercedes has a lot more pace then they showed. Ferrari doesn't seem like it was hiding that much, but they didn't do any proper qualy sims that would put them ahead of the rest of the pack. I'd say that Mercedes is still the team to beat, with Ferrari close behind while RB in my opinion is further behind than last year.McG wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 22:44Ferrari and Mercedes probably still haven't went full bananas though, assuming McLaren went full bananas today (it did seem to break something).
Maybe we will see the top teams have a real go by the end of this test.
Not sticking up for that journalist, but I wouldn't be so sure. She's obviously just another person with a prediction pulled out of thin air that could be right or wrong.
About the journalist, I am sure that she heard couple of guys talking out of their ass, like Gary Anderson and his "eye" that predicts downforce and handling while completely ignoring multitude various variables that can influence it. To say on Day 1 or 2 that McLaren is 2 seconds off where they wanted to be is silly, I'm quite confident that even McLaren didn't know their true pace at that moment so my problem is when people appeal to authority but in fact are throwing out baseless speculation like the rest of us. She mentioned "engineers" on the trackside that used "data", while it probably was Gary Anderson using his downforce vision .