Lol, what was the baseline object? A block of flats?xpensive wrote:Noooh, it was windtunnel tested xtensively to get that particular shape!djos wrote:That scoop is just comical, imagine how poor the airflow is over the rear wing as a result!
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Lol, what was the baseline object? A block of flats?xpensive wrote:Noooh, it was windtunnel tested xtensively to get that particular shape!djos wrote:That scoop is just comical, imagine how poor the airflow is over the rear wing as a result!
True enuf, the sides and back might be "streamlined" but the bit behind the drivers helmet looks quite bluff to me.xpensive wrote:Don't be like that now, objects do not have to be slim to be aerodynamic, instead notice the xtremely smooth curvature.
OK, you're nutsSectorOne wrote:Call me nuts but i love these two cars.
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/u ... 2014-1.jpg
http://www.mercedesamgf1.com/media/file ... %203px.jpg
front wing finally aesthetically pleasing, less of a plow effect, less aero bits on the car, just nice sleek F1 cars but cool in their own ways, one a bit more boxy the other smooth like water.
I loved this car simply because the inside of the air box was also painted red!RicerDude wrote:2003 Jag
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/u ... webb-1.jpg