- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
Sebastian Vettel has won the Italian Grand Prix after starting from pole and never giving away that first position. Fernando Alonso finished second, fending off Mark Webber until the finish line. Felipe Massa ended 4th with Nico Hulkenberg a surprising 5th.
I think it´s because the person who uploaded the picture knew not everyone had watched the session.ecapox wrote:why are the names blurred out? Also, I wonder how that camera is calibrated as nothing else in the picture is registering any level of heat.
How sad is it that Newey is so good that masses of minds must coalesce to overcome his genius. It could work though when considering Rupert Sheldrakes work in morphogenetic field theory...If you get board with a Red Bull runaway Italian GP, the attached video may be a viable race alternative.AnthonyG wrote:According to implications from the global consciousness project, we can influence things just by thinking of them.iotar__ wrote:What's going on, not Red Bull again, and at Monza of all places? It's even worse and is getting annoying, can those useless F1 designers figure out something to beat them?
I suggest we collectivly think at a faulty pitstop for Vettel (narrow it down to left front), that should increase the chances of it happening.
AFAIR in Spa Mercedes was closer to RB's pace in FP than in the race, I know they blamed it on set up but still it was huge. Considering that Vettel was in front comfortably their advantage was probably bigger than time difference. I'd say RB's pace is real, hopefully something happens and they won't be leading after first lap.SectorOne wrote:Red Bull is running less fuel then Ferrari and Mercedes in FP2.Juzh wrote:The usual suspects upfront after fp2. RB look the strongest on both 1 lap and race pace, and are near the top in the speed traps in all 3 sectors. We don't know the fuel of course. Pretty sure rb ran a bit less than some others. Unusual amount of brake issues and locking for hamilton. Lots of brake dust from number of cars.
Same deal as i said in SPA. It might still be quicker but it won´t be close to a second.
Mercedes unconsciously sandbags with their programme. The cars looks slow and somewhat uncontrollable but it´s just heavier fuel load imo.
dren wrote:The two Red Bulls were at the bottom of the speed traps, almost 10mph down on Mercedes. Maybe they are set-up again with the short gearing.
I'm not saying Red Bull will dominate, but to say that they will struggle, because they are 10mph down - is a fallacy, because that's exactly what happened in 2011. Down in the speedtraps, dominated the race.astracrazy wrote:if that is the case they are gonna struggle in the race, vettel will need to bolt
The long and short wheelbase had the same performances, but they switched Kimi back to previous versions just to be sure. It performs the same way as the short one right out of the box and now it's a matter of squeezing that something extra from it. The LWB will return in Singapore.iotar__ wrote: Edit:
Leading developer driver came back to shorter-wheelbase, Lotus threw away FP1,2 data and went down like a brick, another success story.
Why would it return for Singapore isn't a short-wheelbase better for Singapore's twisty track?stefan_ wrote:The long and short wheelbase had the same performances, but they switched Kimi back to previous versions just to be sure. It performs the same way as the short one right out of the box and now it's a matter of squeezing that something extra from it. The LWB will return in Singapore.iotar__ wrote: Edit:
Leading developer driver came back to shorter-wheelbase, Lotus threw away FP1,2 data and went down like a brick, another success story.
It's not the first based-on-nothing tendentious post you make towards Lotus and I am not sure you are writing it because you are being hateful or a bit slow-minded to say the least.
