You're quoting Higher Heating Value. I would argue Lower Heating Value is more appropriate as we are not building a system that is condensing the water vapor in the exhaust into liquid (and recouping the heat of vaporization).Moose wrote:You're both out. Typical pump gasoline energy density is 44.4MJ/kg. Assuming your 6% margin F1 gasoline could be around 47MJ/kg. Given that...Cub wrote:No offense, but you need to check your math.Blackout wrote:Log manifolds + classic turbo layout => the compressor is sandwiched between two very hot manifolds. Interesting.
850hp => 43% thermal efficiency which is hard to believe (Williams confirms in the last F1 racing that fuel heat content is around 43MJ/kg)
Assume LHV = 44MJ/kg. This is the same LHV of diesel, which is 6% higher than petrol and a good guess for F1 fuel. They may go higher, but not astronomically...
47 * 0.278 = 1.305MW
Without KERS
690 * 745.7 = 514.5MW
Efficiency = 39.4%
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion
Without KERS I'm sure Mercedes 2014 was above 690hp and for 2015 I bet it's higher. Mid 40s for thermal efficiency seems like where they are at, which... is quite damn impressive.