For once I agree 100%. Massa was clearly the class of the field last year when it came to competition within his team and against others, but Lewis capitalized and won a deserving championship. Which is why Formula should award at least 12 points to the winner instead of 10. A champion trounces the field.ISLAMATRON wrote:And what of the FIA's BS manipulation of the Spa results when they handed a clear Lewis victory to Massa who did not lead even 1 second of the race?
All of this is pure speculation... We all know Massa was leading in singapore and Lewis was right behind him, what we dont know is who had more fuel and who was had the better tire strategy.
Massa had a great year last year, against a great teammate, and great competitors, more than can be said for Alonso's 2xWDC's when he didnt have to fight his own teammate.
Massa is a world class F1 driver and no amount of Flav's race fixing antics can take that away from him, but Lewis crossed the finish line leading the race more times than Massa did and that in my book makes him the World champ.
Well Ferrari did say that with the economy the way it is driver salaries have had to decrease, and that all the reports of huge amounts given to Alonso are too high. But then again most of what they say is a load of BS.ISLAMATRON wrote:Anyone else think that FErrari are stupid for paying Alonso so much? They seemingly were outbidding themselves... 25M Euros a year? if the reports can be believed...
...In that position you would think that Ferrari were in the higher ground in the negotiations, they surely could have got a better deal.
So they pay Kimi over $45M to Not drive for them(i guess that was decreasing his usual $50 mil paycheck)... If I was a Santander shareholder I'd be knocking down the doors right now.mx_tifosi wrote:Well Ferrari did say that with the economy the way it is driver salaries have had to decrease, and that all the reports of huge amounts given to Alonso are too high. But then again most of what they say is a load of BS.ISLAMATRON wrote:Anyone else think that FErrari are stupid for paying Alonso so much? They seemingly were outbidding themselves... 25M Euros a year? if the reports can be believed...
...In that position you would think that Ferrari were in the higher ground in the negotiations, they surely could have got a better deal.
I don't think anyone is looking into the past so much as recognizing that Massa has been a great driver, had a devistatingly fast teammate in both Kimi and Michael, held his own with Michael and soundly beating Kimi last year. We are just pointing out that Massa is a match for Alonso and it'll be interesting to see how fast he is compared to him and how he will be after his recovery. I really like Alonso for his talent in the car, but I sincerely believe he has absolutely nothing to worry about in Alonso being his teammate. As far as spped goes.tarzoon wrote:Is it my perception or is everyone looking into the past? Last year Massa lost for Hamilton in the last turn, and nothing will change that ever. End of story.
Now the future:
It's a big thing when you're settled in a team, having a car developed for you, having a 7xWDC behind you, and suddenly the worst teammate one could wish for is joining in. A 2xWDC that is as fast as he is competitive and commited.
I'd be right along side you. It's bullshit to pay someone that much not to drive for you and then spend millions on another driver. The paychecks they get are ridiculous, but only we can stop them from getting that much by not watching or purchasing sponsors products.ISLAMATRON wrote:So they pay Kimi over $45M to Not drive for them(i guess that was decreasing his usual $50 mil paycheck)... If I was a Santander shareholder I'd be knocking down the doors right now.mx_tifosi wrote:Well Ferrari did say that with the economy the way it is driver salaries have had to decrease, and that all the reports of huge amounts given to Alonso are too high. But then again most of what they say is a load of BS.ISLAMATRON wrote:Anyone else think that FErrari are stupid for paying Alonso so much? They seemingly were outbidding themselves... 25M Euros a year? if the reports can be believed...
...In that position you would think that Ferrari were in the higher ground in the negotiations, they surely could have got a better deal.
I honestly hope you are right.Ray wrote: I really like Alonso for his talent in the car, but I sincerely believe he has absolutely nothing to worry about in Alonso being his teammate. As far as spped goes.
Spot on.tarzoon wrote:plus his inability to drive with rain.
jddh1 wrote:I have no problems with Massa's comments and neither should Lewis, Alonso, Kimi and anyone really. It just goes to show how badly he wanted that title and there's nothing wrong with that. Obviously we know that things could have changed and perhaps neither of them would have been champion (it was a possibility with Kubica, wasn't it?) We won't know. Did Piquet's action affect his chances? Clearly yes. Would he have been champion for sure? We'll never know.
i cant see kimi struggle in rain when he was in Mclaren....Its the f2007, f2008 and f60 that dont respond well in rain for whoever drives them.nipo wrote:Spot on.tarzoon wrote:plus his inability to drive with rain.
I like Felipe a lot and he is fast and committed and all that, but when the rain comes, he struggles, whereas Kimi, Lewis and FA shine. Vettel as well. I have always thought Felipe didn't have the makings of a champion because of that, and fate was he lost last year's WDC by 1 point.
But make no mistakes. I strongly feel that Alonso is getting #1 status next year and if we see Massa somewhat struggling overall compared to Alonso I won't attribute all of that to driver ability.
Rosberg's???? You mean the same Rosberg that was in tenth place right before Flav mashed the "crash now button"? Ros berg only finished in second because of the incompetence of the Singapore stewards. Rosberg was in that position for the same reason Alonso was in his position.Raptor22 wrote:I agree. I think Lewis response is a little defensive. The Singaporegate swung the momentum toward Lewis but it was not a natural event caused by McLaren or Ferrari.It was the cheating of Renault that swung that momentum.
Massa has a right to feel aggrieved. If this had been discovered last year then perhaps things would be different.
I still think Alonso should be stripped of that win. It's not his,but Rosberg's.Lewis will win the WDC by a larger margin still so I feel he is the rightful champion.
However Massa could still sue for loss of earnings...
It is interesting, and also worrying if you're a Ferrari fan and remember life before Schumacher, Brawn and Todt. It smacks of a return to the bad old days when a person gained political traction within the Ferrari organisation because of his nationality, preferably being Italian or as close as possible. All the work that Todt, Brawn and others did to undo that silliness seems to be unravelling pretty quickly. You've then got Schumacher standing on the pit wall like a spare part with no clear job title, no clear job description, interfering with race strategies and tactics, his closeness to Massa and making comments about his involvement in driver signings. I can see Alonso giving him the cold shoulder as Raikkonen did.nipo wrote:Now both Domenicali and di Montezemolo is mentioning FA being "Latin". Interesting.
Kimi wasn't sacked. He had a contract for next year, everyone expected Alonso to go in 2011, including himself, and it looks as though he decided eventually that a clean break was preferable and his chances would be better elsewhere. I see no reason why this couldn't have been announced at Monza otherwise.Monte also revealed the reason Kimi was sacked - he was keeping everything inside and wasn't communicating very well (if at all).
It's a bad decision. Although no refuelling will change the characteristics of the car, in terms of aerodynamics, mechanicals etc. the regulations are all the same, so what's good about this year's car can be carried over to next year's. Crucially, with the lack of testing you also want a solid, proven testbed.I wonder if Ferrari stopping dev of F60 and moving on to next year's car was one of FA's "requirements" to move to Ferrari. After all, it's very unusual for Ferrari to pull the plug like this.
I think you have reason. Lots of people are already counting not only Alonso's race wins but the number of titles he'll win. All I can see is a powder-keg of political intrigue waiting to go off. They key word is 'Latin'.Maybe it's personal, but I just have a problem with FA's behavior and I am at least "cautious" about the situation within the Ferrari garage next season.
I just had this thought. Could it be that the hurry to get Alonso already in 2010 and not as everyone expected in 2011 may be related to some Ferrari knowledge about the underground F1 politics? Merc buying BGP will be looking for strong driver. With Renault future doubt and likely slow car again if they stay, if a fast car is already available in 2010 Alonso may decide to jump to Merc?segedunum wrote:Kimi wasn't sacked. He had a contract for next year, everyone expected Alonso to go in 2011, including himself, and it looks as though he decided eventually that a clean break was preferable and his chances would be better elsewhere. I see no reason why this couldn't have been announced at Monza otherwise.