2014 Design

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Blanchimont
Blanchimont
214
Joined: 09 Nov 2012, 23:47

Re: 2014 Design

Post

I would not trust Charlie, it seems he's no idea of the rules.

For example:
AMuS: Die Regeln erlauben maximal acht Gänge. Darf man auch mit sieben fahren?
Whiting: Das wäre kein Problem.

Translation:
AMuS: The rules allow a maximum of 8 gears. Can you run the car with seven gears, too?
Whiting: That would be OK.

The rules say:
"9.6.1 The number of forward gear ratios must be 8."
Dear FIA, if you read this, please pm me for a redesign of the Technical Regulations to avoid finger nose shapes for 2016! :-)

User avatar
Holm86
247
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Blanchimont wrote:I would not trust Charlie, it seems he's no idea of the rules.

For example:
AMuS: Die Regeln erlauben maximal acht Gänge. Darf man auch mit sieben fahren?
Whiting: Das wäre kein Problem.

Translation:
AMuS: The rules allow a maximum of 8 gears. Can you run the car with seven gears, too?
Whiting: That would be OK.

The rules say:
"9.6.1 The number of forward gear ratios must be 8."
I thought Charlie was one who had to know the regulations as good as possible.

CBeck113
CBeck113
51
Joined: 17 Feb 2013, 19:43

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Blanchimont wrote:I would not trust Charlie, it seems he's no idea of the rules.

For example:
AMuS: Die Regeln erlauben maximal acht Gänge. Darf man auch mit sieben fahren?
Whiting: Das wäre kein Problem.

Translation:
AMuS: The rules allow a maximum of 8 gears. Can you run the car with seven gears, too?
Whiting: That would be OK.

The rules say:
"9.6.1 The number of forward gear ratios must be 8."
Just don't underestimate him either - the gears must be there, but you don't have to use them. There is a bit lost in translation here, since that statement could also mean "Are you allowed to drive with seven?" I wish AMS would print their interviews in the original language, since they lean themselves out the window so often.
“Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony!” Monty Python and the Holy Grail

User avatar
Blackout
1567
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Holm86 wrote:
Blackout wrote:Charlie didnt read the rules :lol: :arrow:
apparently not. The "Caterham" has a single central pylon. As far as I know thats not legal.
And the 'vanity panel'/higher nose is illegal because too high ; )

User avatar
Atreydes
1
Joined: 08 Jan 2014, 15:56

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Last edited by Atreydes on 23 Jan 2014, 12:36, edited 1 time in total.

Tourgott
Tourgott
2
Joined: 04 Jan 2014, 20:18

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Blanchimont wrote:I would not trust Charlie, it seems he's no idea of the rules.

For example:
AMuS: Die Regeln erlauben maximal acht Gänge. Darf man auch mit sieben fahren?
Whiting: Das wäre kein Problem.

Translation:
AMuS: The rules allow a maximum of 8 gears. Can you run the car with seven gears, too?
Whiting: That would be OK.

The rules say:
"9.6.1 The number of forward gear ratios must be 8."
I would be surprised If he actually wouldn't be aware of such a basic rule. So I guess he knows what he is talking about ;)
But if the three examples are actually legal then I'm pretty sure we will see such solutions in Australia.

User avatar
Blackout
1567
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Well he seems not to be aware of this article
But I might be wrong

Code: Select all

3.7.9 No bodywork situated forward of the line A-A referred to Drawing 5 may extend above a diagonal line from a point on A-A and 625mm above the reference plane to a point 50mm rearward of the forward-most point of the impact absorbing structure defined in Article 15.4.3 and 300mm above the reference plane. No bodywork situated forward of the forward-most point of this diagonal line may be more than 300mm above the reference plane.
With the exception of a transparent windscreen, antenna or pitot tubes, no bodywork situated between the line A-A referred to in Drawing 5 and the secondary roll structure may lie more than 625mm above the reference plane.
2014 F1 Technical Regulations 12/88 9 December 2013
© 2013 Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile
Any bodywork situated above the impact absorbing structure defined by Article 15.4.3 or above the survival cell, and forward of the line B-B, must be of prescribed laminate, details of this laminate may be found in the Appendix to the Technical Regulations.
If I understand it well, Vanity panel must remain below this blue line if your car's nose has this design : P
Image
hecti wrote:Image

Racer_D
Racer_D
1
Joined: 08 Sep 2009, 08:54

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Image

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: 2014 Design

Post

What i notice about the williams and what other cars might do, is that the wing pylons will be used as turning vanes to fill out that area behind the crash structure.
It's a nice looking car actually. It's not so bad. Kind of reminds me of the illegal nose i drew, only without the concaved sides, but they are basically using the principle of getting flow around the sides of the shnozz.
For Sure!!

User avatar
Kiril Varbanov
147
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 15:00
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia

Re: 2014 Design

Post


User avatar
KingHamilton01
3
Joined: 08 Jun 2012, 17:12

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Everything we have seen compared to when it comes to race day in first race will be completely overhauled, I expect a couple of team's to have had that eureka moment and then the other team's will race to copy it.
McLaren Mercedes

User avatar
idfx
53
Joined: 20 Dec 2013, 03:18

Re: 2014 Design

Post

F1 2014 = "MachoCar" :lol:
----------

michl420
michl420
20
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Would it be a advantage to posititon the engine air intake behind the drivers helmet and use the roll hoop intake for cooling or reduce it a minimum. Because the rules say this inlets must be visible in their entirety when viewed from the front of the car and without the driver seated in the car.

radosav
radosav
23
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 20:46

Re: 2014 Design

Post

This season cars will look better after crash than before crash!

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: 2014 Design

Post

Image
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985