That was a costly mistake and to my eye unnecessary so early in the session. Some similarities with Australia on cold tyres?
It was apparent from free practice that 1 outlap was not enough for RB to get heat into the tires to start a push lap and they were vulnerable in T1 as a result. There's a replay on the previous page of Checo sliding through there, and many times both of them struggled there. Max said as much during the qualy interview, that he was "cautious" in T1.
Oracle supercomputersChuckjr wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 10:17The RB floor makes the Merc floor look rudimentary by comparison. It’s downright embarrassing for Merc. It’s like comparing stick people art to photorealistic paintings or space ships to prop planes. Hats off to Newey and the RB team. What an accomplishment. If I was Lewis I’d be packing my bags now. Ain’t no way Merc is catching RB anytime before 2026, and likely still won’t thereafter. Today was an eye opener.
I agree. What are the odds of Mercedes producing another dominant PU? More so in a budget restricted era? A dominant PU was fundamental for the competitiveness of Mercedes cars. Aston Martin ditching Mercedes doesn't inspire confidence. On the other hand, RBPT is a question mark, but if the competitiveness of their engineers and their infrastructure/tools are as good as the race team, then they might induce a long period of pain on the competition from 2026.Chuckjr wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 10:17The RB floor makes the Merc floor look rudimentary by comparison. It’s downright embarrassing for Merc. It’s like comparing stick people art to photorealistic paintings or space ships to prop planes. Hats off to Newey and the RB team. What an accomplishment. If I was Lewis I’d be packing my bags now. Ain’t no way Merc is catching RB anytime before 2026, and likely still won’t thereafter. Today was an eye opener.
I think RBPT took a couple of the good heads from Mercedes. Im not sure how the Honda staff are allocated at the minute, whether the operations (at present) are done by Honda, or RBPT. Chances are, Honda will want their guys back if they are in a 2026 engine development.mendis wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 14:24I agree. What are the odds of Mercedes producing another dominant PU? More so in a budget restricted era? A dominant PU was fundamental for the competitiveness of Mercedes cars. Aston Martin ditching Mercedes doesn't inspire confidence. On the other hand, RBPT is a question mark, but if the competitiveness of their engineers and their infrastructure/tools are as good as the race team, then they might induce a long period of pain on the competition from 2026.Chuckjr wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 10:17The RB floor makes the Merc floor look rudimentary by comparison. It’s downright embarrassing for Merc. It’s like comparing stick people art to photorealistic paintings or space ships to prop planes. Hats off to Newey and the RB team. What an accomplishment. If I was Lewis I’d be packing my bags now. Ain’t no way Merc is catching RB anytime before 2026, and likely still won’t thereafter. Today was an eye opener.
When Honda announced F1 exit, Yamamoto moved out of Honda to form a consulting that is working with RBPT. He obviously would have brought a lot of Honda engineers with him. So there is that strength.chrisc90 wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 14:29I think RBPT took a couple of the good heads from Mercedes. Im not sure how the Honda staff are allocated at the minute, whether the operations (at present) are done by Honda, or RBPT. Chances are, Honda will want their guys back if they are in a 2026 engine development.mendis wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 14:24I agree. What are the odds of Mercedes producing another dominant PU? More so in a budget restricted era? A dominant PU was fundamental for the competitiveness of Mercedes cars. Aston Martin ditching Mercedes doesn't inspire confidence. On the other hand, RBPT is a question mark, but if the competitiveness of their engineers and their infrastructure/tools are as good as the race team, then they might induce a long period of pain on the competition from 2026.Chuckjr wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 10:17The RB floor makes the Merc floor look rudimentary by comparison. It’s downright embarrassing for Merc. It’s like comparing stick people art to photorealistic paintings or space ships to prop planes. Hats off to Newey and the RB team. What an accomplishment. If I was Lewis I’d be packing my bags now. Ain’t no way Merc is catching RB anytime before 2026, and likely still won’t thereafter. Today was an eye opener.
It remains to be seen that those guys don't return "home".mendis wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 14:35When Honda announced F1 exit, Yamamoto moved out of Honda to form a consulting that is working with RBPT. He obviously would have brought a lot of Honda engineers with him. So there is that strength.chrisc90 wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 14:29I think RBPT took a couple of the good heads from Mercedes. Im not sure how the Honda staff are allocated at the minute, whether the operations (at present) are done by Honda, or RBPT. Chances are, Honda will want their guys back if they are in a 2026 engine development.mendis wrote: ↑28 May 2023, 14:24I agree. What are the odds of Mercedes producing another dominant PU? More so in a budget restricted era? A dominant PU was fundamental for the competitiveness of Mercedes cars. Aston Martin ditching Mercedes doesn't inspire confidence. On the other hand, RBPT is a question mark, but if the competitiveness of their engineers and their infrastructure/tools are as good as the race team, then they might induce a long period of pain on the competition from 2026.