ScottB wrote:I think people need to remember the age guys like Alonso are as they make predictions for who'll be driving where in years to come...
When it comes to, say, Mercedes, if one of your seats is up for grabs, do you hire a guy who has, at best, a year or two left at his prime (if he isn't already past it, for all we know), or do you look to secure a promising youngster when your other driver is also into his 30's?
Certainly I'm inclined to suspect that Mercedes and / or Ferrari sniffing around Verstappen was what resulted in his promotion to his Red Bull seat, so perhaps that's an indication of the thinking that's going on as to who / what sort of driver will be in line for any empty Merc / Ferrari race seats...
Good point.
Still, they definately will have the desire to find a 'guaranteed' WDC as a replacement for either Rosberg/Hamilton.
GP-winner is one thing, WDC capable is another thing - especially when the chances exist that as of 2017, they possibly won't be as dominant as they are now. For all it could, they could be just as or even more dominant. BUT, if Ferrari and RedBull suddenly find themselves on the same level, then the driver becomes more important.
Let's just say it hard; if the car is untouchable, haryanto might suffice.
If it isn't, then you want quality and capability - atleast, it becomes more important.
So Wehrlein would be interesting, but is he even capable of being a GP-winner? Wehrlein has not had a decent car under his feet, but i'm not sure. I can't really tell you who would. Verstappen, yes but he's taken. Raikkonen? over. Button? wont come back. Alonso good choice but indeed for a short period. Vettel, would be funny. Bottas, i dunno, i rather see Bottas in the likes of Kovalainen or as a finnish Heidfeld, but then again, he isn't even a GP winner.
If Mercedes really has balls, they'll bring in Pastor Maldonado. GP WINNER!