Huge amount of "free" floor area. They could play tennis on that so to speak. Important to know is that the technology and know how behind the packaging can be used next year, giving an edge in that area even before the 2014 season starts.
Huge amount of "free" floor area. They could play tennis on that so to speak. Important to know is that the technology and know how behind the packaging can be used next year, giving an edge in that area even before the 2014 season starts.
The car is very well packaged at the rear, but the last image gives the illusion of the rear floor being more 'free' than it really is. A great deal of the 'floor' in that area is sloped and merges with the cooling exits/engine cover.turbof1 wrote:Huge amount of "free" floor area. They could play tennis on that so to speak. Important to know is that the technology and know how behind the packaging can be used next year, giving an edge in that area even before the 2014 season starts.
Well you get more downforce from a bigger surface area which the 2 element has but when at high speeds it can stall. The three element has less downforce(less surface area) but it won't be effected as bad at high speed stall. Considering Singapore doesn't really have any high speed corners compared to Spa is probably why they went back to 2-element one.turbof1 wrote:Interesting that they went back from the Spa 3-element cascade to the 2-element one.
That is wrong. High speed airflow over a wing is less likely to stall actually. When the airspeed slows down it is more likely to stall. Go and do some research on wings and their profiles.Spacepace wrote:Well you get more downforce from a bigger surface area which the 2 element has but when at high speeds it can stall. The three element has less downforce(less surface area) but it won't be effected as bad at high speed stall. Considering Singapore doesn't really have any high speed corners compared to Spa is probably why they went back to 2-element one.turbof1 wrote:Interesting that they went back from the Spa 3-element cascade to the 2-element one.
Yeah the speed might be wrong but the point of having more profiles is to counter stalling and better downforce creating on the inne edge when the tyre turns.trinidefender wrote:That is wrong. High speed airflow over a wing is less likely to stall actually. When the airspeed slows down it is more likely to stall. Go and do some research on wings and their profiles.Spacepace wrote:Well you get more downforce from a bigger surface area which the 2 element has but when at high speeds it can stall. The three element has less downforce(less surface area) but it won't be effected as bad at high speed stall. Considering Singapore doesn't really have any high speed corners compared to Spa is probably why they went back to 2-element one.turbof1 wrote:Interesting that they went back from the Spa 3-element cascade to the 2-element one.
Just another snippet of information, a wings apparent angle of attack to the airflow changes more as the wing moves up and down while the car is moving slowly through the air than when it is moving quite fast. While these wings operate on the edge of their aerodynamic performance concerning downforce any slight over pitch will cause part of the wing to stall and them to lose downforce
Looks that way... But since they went all the way from lowest downforce to max we can't be absolutely sure.Huntresa wrote:They are running dipped down nose again compared to the streteched square one at Spa and Monza, so we can assume that one was Low DF specific ?