With the track debut of the new V6 turbo engines coming closer and closer, teams are admitting that one of the major challenges of getting and efficient and reliable package will be managing the cooling systems.
with the exception of 1a and 4a, the noses you have posted fall foul according to this. thats all im trying to say, unless you want to show why they are excluded with some clever interpretation
5a seems to have a relavitely thick central 'pylon' that could be a single section. also has 2 lower pylons to the wing.
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"
with the exception of 1a and 4a, the noses you have posted fall foul according to this. thats all im trying to say, unless you want to show why they are excluded with some clever interpretation
5a seems to have a relavitely thick central 'pylon' that could be a single section. also has 2 lower pylons to the wing.
aww childhood memories. i'm sure it would bring a good technical discussion point
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"
timbo wrote:Did I miss something? Is enclosing driveshaft into suspension arm now forbidden? All cars presented so far seem to have driveshafts open.
probabyl has something to do with the modified suspensions to allow usage of the suspension arms as a 'beam wing' replacement. there has to be some movement.
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"
I know i'm pretty late to the party but I had a thought when I saw a pic of the beauty we all know and love below. Could this be a way around the nose/clean airflow issue, could someone simply raise the legality center section of the front wing to the maximum nose height and slope the fw ends down to their minimum height? Something similar to below but encompassing the fw neutral center section.
Mysticf1 wrote:I know i'm pretty late to the party but I had a thought when I saw a pic of the beauty we all know and love below. Could this be a way around the nose/clean airflow issue, could someone simply raise the legality center section of the front wing to the maximum nose height and slope the fw ends down to their minimum height? Something similar to below but encompassing the fw neutral center section.
with the exception of 1a and 4a, the noses you have posted fall foul according to this. thats all im trying to say, unless you want to show why they are excluded with some clever interpretation
This design is different from my project.
My project follows this concept.