Not sure – on the other hand, you have a engine that's working much harder, more friction in the transmission, KERS being charged and discharged in big dollops.raymondu999 wrote:Would you not need LESS cooling at a power circuit? For one thing it cuts on drag, and for another, when you're traveling at 330km/h you have more air than 300km/h anyways
raymondu999 wrote:Is it an effect of parallax, or is Alonso running more wing?
Yes, they did revert to the previous version of the suspension but I don't think it is the only reason. I am sure the low downforce nature of the track as well as the cold track temperature played a part.raymondu999 wrote:They reverted to pre-Silverstone suspension? If they did it could be a cause; though with such a long lap I didn't think they'd have much trouble building up tyre temps; especially with long/big lateral loadings on the fronts in all 3 sectors
Yes, Silverstone was cool but there was downforce to, as you say, load the tyres as well as the very fast changes of direction through Maggots, Becketts and Chapel coupled with the other fast corners as well.raymondu999 wrote:IIRC Silverstone was also very cold; but yes there was no downforce to help load/heat the tyres
He was slower in the speed traps...dren wrote:Did Massa have a more wet set-up? He was way off compared to Alonso. Might help explain the gap in qualifying also.
NobleF1 Jon Noble
The FIA has begun its annual checking of engine conformity. Fernando Alonso's power-unit given okay - and interesting details on usage
Alonso engine used: Malaysia (P3, Q, race), China (P3, Q, race), Monaco (P3, Q, race), plus P1 + P2 in Europe, GB and Germany
They probably run a fairly fresh engine for Monza as it´s very important for them to win there.raymondu999 wrote:That's a high usage cycle. They're not planning on using that for Monza Q+R are they?