Yes, they are the minimum dimensions, but teams try to get it as small as possible.
By the way, diagram 5 on page 73 of the 2012 Technical Reg explains it.
http://www.fia.com/sport/Regulations/f1regs.html
What is your basis for this statement? Where are you getting your actual car dimensions from?Tozza Mazza wrote: the teams are actually using it to be narrower and shorter than the minimum
In the context of compromises that we have little knowledge of unfortunately.richard_leeds wrote: but teams try to get it as small as possible.
This is a technical forum, not really for admiration. We want to understand why and how something is done.Ian P. wrote:.... SO WHAT....
It's still relevant. The same thing is still happening; just at a total lower height.Tozza Mazza wrote:I think the info there is out of date.
Newey was doing it to allow more air in through the bottom without compromising CofG too heavily. And now in this era of max bulkhead height he's using it to lower the CofG without losing too much space for air to flow through beneath the nose.Tozza Mazza wrote:the teams are actually using it to be narrower and shorter than the minimum, how has this not been banned?!
There is no hole in the bulkhead. No cooling duct flow. This is the exact same front bulkhead configuration as the RB7. Note the position of the white caps.ESPImperium wrote: i just want to knwo what the "cooling duct" is cooling.