1990 - Surprising that these cars had enough grip to get around the Singes corner flatout with wings that were quiet flat
[Layout used that year was not the full circuit]
While they punish drivers, forcing pitstops they still remove a lot of the danger and spectacle. Graveltraps provide alot of good footage with gravel spraying and also gives the chance of spectacular crashes.f1316 wrote:Right, so this is my question: isn't the whole point of Paul Ricard's runoffs that they're designed to punish wide running by affecting the tyres?
Scratch the question, read for yourself:
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/gforcef1 ... racks/amp/
So will these be retained for F1? I hope so - would be a very useful test for an initiative that I'd like to see used at other circuits.
Right, but they're more dangerous so the FIA are not going to go back to installing more gravel traps - it's just not going to happen.Sniffit wrote:While they punish drivers, forcing pitstops they still remove a lot of the danger and spectacle. Graveltraps provide alot of good footage with gravel spraying and also gives the chance of spectacular crashes.f1316 wrote:Right, so this is my question: isn't the whole point of Paul Ricard's runoffs that they're designed to punish wide running by affecting the tyres?
Scratch the question, read for yourself:
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/gforcef1 ... racks/amp/
So will these be retained for F1? I hope so - would be a very useful test for an initiative that I'd like to see used at other circuits.
The Pirelli tyres do a good enough job of eating themselves, not sure they need fancy run off to achieve thatBanMeToo wrote:Qualifying will be cool on a 'new' track. Not so much the race.
Do the runoffs actually work? Will they eat Pirelli tires?
Tim.Wright wrote:That link doesn't say anything about damaging tyres. In fact it says that one advantage of this type of runoff is that the service vehicles can easily drive over it. Its abrasive, but that is a long way from damaging a tyre. An ultra abrasive surface will wear a tyre out quickly if you keep running over it, but its not going destroy a tyre unles you lock up over it.Edax wrote: The fact that the paint damages tires is even on the FIA site. It is just not stated whether it is when locked-up only, or under moderate load.
http://www.fiainstitute.com/media-centr ... re-02.aspx
In fact even that's debbatable - see 1:09
I think we can consider this tyre "destroying nature" of the Paul Ricard run-off nothing but an internet myth...
Only now realising that there was a response here (sorry!).Tim.Wright wrote: ↑10 Dec 2016, 16:30I've tried in the past to search for any confirmation that the run-off areas lf Paul Ricard will destroy tyres by passing over them but there is absolutely nothing from a reputable source. From what I can gather it's a myth that's propagated and is now repeted as fact (i.e. on that Gforce blog above).
Here's my input from another thread some time ago:Tim.Wright wrote:That link doesn't say anything about damaging tyres. In fact it says that one advantage of this type of runoff is that the service vehicles can easily drive over it. Its abrasive, but that is a long way from damaging a tyre. An ultra abrasive surface will wear a tyre out quickly if you keep running over it, but its not going destroy a tyre unles you lock up over it.Edax wrote: The fact that the paint damages tires is even on the FIA site. It is just not stated whether it is when locked-up only, or under moderate load.
http://www.fiainstitute.com/media-centr ... re-02.aspx
In fact even that's debbatable - see 1:09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Toosc2WUrFA
I think we can consider this tyre "destroying nature" of the Paul Ricard run-off nothing but an internet myth...