
https://x.com/MercedesAMGF1/status/1894045381282943286
Change "x" to "twitter" in your link and it'll embedzibby43 wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 19:44https://x.com/rosariogiulianag/status/1 ... 326574293?
No matter what I try, I can’t embed anything here anymore. I give up.
I’ll keep tinkering. Thank you.organic wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 19:55Change "x" to "twitter" in your link and it'll embedzibby43 wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 19:44https://x.com/rosariogiulianag/status/1 ... 326574293?
No matter what I try, I can’t embed anything here anymore. I give up.
Many thanks!!Mattchu wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 20:40From @RosarioGiuliana via X/twitter/whatever its called
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gkj87P1WkAA ... name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gkj87P7WsAA ... name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gkj87P2WIAA ... name=large
^ The way Iv`e found is to click the image in X/twitter, then right click on the image and select "open image in new tab" -> Now highlight and copy the link in the address bar (should start pbs.twimg.) then place that in the [img ] [ /img] tags (spaces added to make img`s readable)...
I kind of get that theme across the whole grid; in 2022 and a lesser extent 2023 we saw a huge variance in design ideas. It seems like a lot of these early designs might have offered great theoretical potential but teams lacked the know-how to implement them in the real world. Things like the W13/W14 skinny sidepod inlets (and then overbite mid-wing on W14"B") and some wing shapes. The AMR22 and the C42 with their massive sidepod undercuts which have now become the norm but at the time it was thought that front tire wake could not be properly controlled. Even the SF-25 has some ideas that are heavily evolved from the F1-75 even if the intervening cars ditched them.