"Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2004 12:59 pm"
Also in local race series, where iron rotors are used, they use qualy rotors and race rotors, mainly cause a matter of unsprung weight savings.riff_raff wrote: The reason F1 cars go through so many sets of CRC brakes is that they are designed (in thickness) to last exactly one race distance. The pads and rotors are made from the same materials, and wear equally over the course of a race.
i love that idea.unfortunatelly no engine sound anymore--autogyro wrote:Simple on F1.
Do away with the IC engine and replace it with a large flywheel storage unit.
Then bring back Kers.
Brakes sorted.
Simple innit.
here some basic info.n smikle wrote:How is the production car carbon Ceramic different from the Formula 1 carbon disk? as in, the material ingredients.
So the carbon fibre is the reinforcing material for the Silicon Carbide Silicon Carbon . So to recap, The carbon fibres give the tensile strength and they still remain strong at high temperatures. zeen.. I never looked on the carbon brakes as a carbon reinforced material before. (before this, I thought it was just a mishmash of ceramic and carbon stuff ) good article.marcush. wrote:here some basic info.n smikle wrote:How is the production car carbon Ceramic different from the Formula 1 carbon disk? as in, the material ingredients.
http://www.technology-forum.com/fileadm ... _discs.pdf
Production cars use carbon fibre reinforced silicon carbide brake discs. F1 use carbon fibre reinforced carbon discs - no ceramics involved there.n smikle wrote:So the carbon fibre is the reinforcing material for the Silicon Carbide Silicon Carbon . So to recap, The carbon fibres give the tensile strength and they still remain strong at high temperatures. zeen.. I never looked on the carbon brakes as a carbon reinforced material before. (before this, I thought it was just a mishmash of ceramic and carbon stuff ) good article.marcush. wrote:here some basic info.n smikle wrote:How is the production car carbon Ceramic different from the Formula 1 carbon disk? as in, the material ingredients.
http://www.technology-forum.com/fileadm ... _discs.pdf
are you referring to air braking system which are mainly used in large vehicles? The considerable inertial mass of these heavy-duty vehicles in combination with the high speeds at which they travel require a braking system which responds rapidly with substantial braking power.meves wrote:A related but slightly off topic question. Could F1 brakes be made sealed so that only a specified volume of air per second was allow to pass over them for cooling. This could be restricted to be safe but to mean after repeated full use the brakes would begin fade but with management the brakes would be fine. If the driver had to manage the brakes it may make the braking distances longer hopefully making the racing more interesting....
Hmm i think he is talking about limiting the brake cooling inlets so that cooling isnt so efficient.archebald23 wrote:are you referring to air braking system which are mainly used in large vehicles? The considerable inertial mass of these heavy-duty vehicles in combination with the high speeds at which they travel require a braking system which responds rapidly with substantial braking power.meves wrote:A related but slightly off topic question. Could F1 brakes be made sealed so that only a specified volume of air per second was allow to pass over them for cooling. This could be restricted to be safe but to mean after repeated full use the brakes would begin fade but with management the brakes would be fine. If the driver had to manage the brakes it may make the braking distances longer hopefully making the racing more interesting....
I think it is due to the weight of this brake disc kit why it is not used on racing cars.
Wouldn't it be like restrictor plates in other series?MuseF1 wrote:Hmm i think he is talking about limiting the brake cooling inlets so that cooling isnt so efficient.
I think it would be hard to gauge because different tracks need different requirements, so it would be hard to limit them safely without standardising all the teams brake systems?
Of course if we started to design ways to convert this brake heat directly into electrical energy, then that would be a whole new ball game would it not?syndony wrote:I suspect that inboard brakes in a modern F1 vehicle would require solutions to be found for several potential issues. A braking event is quite violent, so a structural engineer would like the torque tube to be stiff (hence large diameter) to avoid dynamic problems caused by the torque tube "winding up". On the other hand, an aerodynamicist would like the torque tube not to interfere with airflow, so he would like a small diameter tube (hence flexible). The unsprung weight reduction would be offset, to some extent, by the need to add a strong CVJ at either end of the torque tube. Cooling would be an issue that might be solved by water-cooling, but that solution would carry with it a weight overhead. Finally, there is not too much room at either axle to package inboard brakes in a modern F1 chassis