Same hereShrek wrote:if it was up to me i would have it nascar style with no off weeks in between races
Same hereShrek wrote:if it was up to me i would have it nascar style with no off weeks in between races
+1mx_tifosi wrote:22-26 GP's but at least some winter testing and winter break. F1 year round would get old, just as anything else really. A break gets us anxious and gives good separation between each season.
20 sounds good and is much better than 17, as the seasons went by too quickly in recent years.
...IMO.
That expectation is unrealistic. Teams will just use more simulation instead of testing. Development will not be put off due to lack of testing. They will simply test on Fridays.therealjackson wrote:i think its referring to how reducing testing and increasing the amount of races will remove some of the engineering development of the sport, making it become more just a form of entertainment by taking away part of the technical side.WhiteBlue wrote:And what has this to do with the topic?nicander24 wrote:Do not agree... F1 isn't just entertainment and sports... it's the pinnacle of engineering!!!
A four months break is too much for me. I also hate that they drive around for all February and I can't get any decent TV coverage of testing. It's a complete waste. The more testing you give the teams the more money and resources they waste on it. If there are only shake down tests it's still the same for all and some come better or worse prepared. But you will be able to watch it. At some times in winter testing there were more fans at the Spanish tests than at some of the races 2009.forty-two wrote:+1mx_tifosi wrote:22-26 GP's but at least some winter testing and winter break. F1 year round would get old, just as anything else really. A break gets us anxious and gives good separation between each season.
20 sounds good and is much better than 17, as the seasons went by too quickly in recent years.
...IMO.
I think the break is essential for both the nerves of the fans and for the teams to have time to take stock.
Personally, don't enjoy the newer circuits so much as the crowds are so often not really there (eg. Turkey).
Twenty is plenty.
That would really be good. I am still for as much as 24-26 races.Indianapolis is still a logical venue for a US Formula One Grand Prix and an eventual return is on the cards, commercial supremo Bernie Ecclestone said.
"It is. It's only the fact that it's all the wrong crowd and the wrong people ... nothing worked there really, we'd have to have a big change round," the Briton told Reuters at Sunday's season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix. "But we'd like to get back there."
Asked whether the United States could be back on the calendar as early as next year, the 79-year-old replied: "We can have a look. Twenty one races, no problem."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/motorsp ... 624387.stm?Bernie Eccletone wrote:We are not dropping anything. [It's] 20 races - getting ready for 25.
=D>WhiteBlue wrote:Who wants tests in winter if we can have races?
+1raceman wrote:=D>WhiteBlue wrote:Who wants tests in winter if we can have races?
+1
Not exactly a testimony to your competence in economic questions. The Abu Dhabi, Bahrain type races will keep the teams afloat (besides filling Bernie's coffers). Without these races we will not have a US race or some of the non paying European races. They also run in the off season when you cannot race in Europe due to climatic reasons. We need more races in south and north Africa methink.toto1041 wrote:If you keep adding more races each one's value becomes lessened. F1 should get rid of the fat and eliminate the "boring-middle-of-the-desert-with-no-attendance-or-atmosphere" races.
WB: attack the post, not the poster. One thing I learned in 40+ years in a variety of businesses: as the supply of an item increases, its value as expressed as the price you can get for it, often (not always) decreases.WhiteBlue wrote:Not exactly a testimony to your competence in economic questions. The Abu Dhabi, Bahrain type races will keep the teams afloat (besides filling Bernie's coffers). Without these races we will not have a US race or some of the non paying European races. They also run in the off season when you cannot race in Europe due to climatic reasons. We need more races in south and north Africa methink.toto1041 wrote:If you keep adding more races each one's value becomes lessened. F1 should get rid of the fat and eliminate the "boring-middle-of-the-desert-with-no-attendance-or-atmosphere" races.
WB, you state very clearly why I (and probably many others) distrust the idea of more races: it's just (IMHO) Bernie using an extortionate technique with one goal only: more money for Bernie:22-26 GP's but at least some winter testing and winter break. F1 year round would get old, just as anything else really. A break gets us anxious and gives good separation between each season.
20 sounds good and is much better than 17, as the seasons went by too quickly in recent years.
...IMO.
Simple translation: Bernie is saying "give me more races or there will not be a US GP." And there are NO "non paying" races.Without these races we will not have a US race or some of the non paying European races.