Difficult to answer...this is simply wrong. The token system was dropped for the 2017 season. So between 2014 and 2016 we had three years where the engine layout could not be changed for the split turbo as the tokens were not enough for this.Jolle wrote: ↑25 Jan 2022, 12:01At the beginning of the hybid era, there was indeed a token system. But this was dropped after 1 ½ years to give Renault and Ferrari the opportunity to catch up. The funny part was that Renault never used it’s amount of tokens they could spend. Both Renault and Ferrari had lots of opportunity to change the layout of their engine, like Honda did, but choose not to and keep most of their layout the same over the whole period.basti313 wrote: ↑25 Jan 2022, 11:31In the past you could outspend your opponents, but you had to invest and invest every year. Technologies that were smart were allowed for some time and then got banned to level the field again.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑25 Jan 2022, 10:09
Red Bull tried to do F1 on the cheap and got bitten on the bum by it. Mercedes invested massively in building the entire package and reaped the rewards from that. That's life.
With the engines you had to outsmart and outspend your opponents once and then got it cemented by the token system for three years. And the three year experience could never be overcome with a new engine, so it cemented itself. It is not a coincidence that Honda who was out of the tokens at the beginning is the only engine really challenging Merc...
In my point of view cementing the engine advantage is something completely out of the usual F1 habits. I do not find any other example where supreme technologies were not banned by the rules after maybe 2 years but could live their advantage for 10 years.
So I think it is wrong to make something small or normal out of this. The lasting engine difference is some remarkable change in F1 politics.
Why did no one change to this solution in 2017 is also easy to answer. Honda messed up completely and had the by far worst engine on the grid, so the split turbo was a bit in question in 2017. Then Ferrari made up the deficit with tricks...only now, since 2020 one can clearly see that the split turbo is the thing to have and with closing the loop holes on fuel and oil tricks the better efficiency is obvious.
I am convinced that Renault, maybe even Ferrari (AVL!) turns up with a split turbo in four weeks.
Difficult to speak about Renault, they simply had no money in the past. This is toxic, so I do not know how to use Renault as any example.Jolle wrote: ↑25 Jan 2022, 12:01Especially Renault has been lagging behind behind the rest but this is not Mercedes fault and this doesn’t entitle RedBull just to get the Mercedes engine. Luckily Honda and McLaren didn’t work out, else RedBull would have been fighting for third in the championship behind McLaren and Mercedes, with Ferrari.
I also do not see a Merc fault, Merc was brilliant. It is the error of Ferrari and the rule makers. Merc just said "thank you".
McLaren even stated that they never had exclusivity with Honda. And also the talks between RB and Honda started way before the split. I am quite sure that we would have seen the Honda in the RB and TR with or without McLaren having it. Just for the reason that Marco very well knew he needs the split turbo and nothing else. The Austrian connection of Indra (AVL), Marco and Lauda knew exactly that this is the only way to win.