How do you make such assessment that no F1 related tech person did?godlameroso wrote: ↑05 Jan 2021, 04:28Ferrari is an interesting case, the engine has evolved so much, and the version that was used this year, it reminded me of when Honda started in F1, there just wasn't enough MGU-K deployment.
Engine power was there, but it just fell flat.
As far as I know, start of the season is the end of it. They only get one new PU for this year. Not sure if they can delay, and use last year's, that would surely mean dragging around last year's chassis for Ferrari.godlameroso wrote: ↑05 Jan 2021, 04:28Everyone seems to be confident of decent gains for next year. Mercedes is rumored to be bringing 25-30hp, Honda says 35-40hp?!?!*, Ferrari says it believes 30hp for the start of the season is within reach.
I can buy such Honda gains, but I'm doubtful there's much to have for Mercedes. They say it cost a lot of effort to even get where they are. I don't think they suddenly found a good chunk of unexplored potential.
(you added an asterisk, but didn't follow up)
As for Honda, I wonder what will happen with that. Andy Cowell and other rumors have died out. RB stated that they wanted to sort it out last year, but they didn't.
I don't know why they can just convince Honda to remain on a cut back budget, with some additional funding from RB. They'll need to keep something up for IndyCar anyway. Let them focus on MGU if their intention to develop EV tech is honest, RB can hire people (and/or pay for the current ones) to improve the engine.
Not much chance until they're running hybrid engines, I suspect.godlameroso wrote: ↑05 Jan 2021, 04:28In 2025 they should release a documentary series about these engines. The development, and work that went into them really deserves to be told.