Not sure it's an odd decission tbh – they have nothing to lose and a lot of data on how it's working/not to gain.Lycoming wrote:doesn't seem to have provided them with the performance they were hoping for. odd decision to run it based solely on a bit of running in P3, Mclaren tested that DRS rear wing for ages before finally running it at spa. but I guess this is how they mean by being more radical.
It looks like they have successfully reverse engineered the Red Bull Monza wing left behind by Mark Webber at the Parabolica. I am referring to the Carbon Fibre layering technique to achieve flexibility of course; rather than the design of the wing itself. I read somewhere in the forum that half the front wing ended up with Ferrari.Francesc wrote:The 2012 wing is quite flexible
Yup, RBR totalled their car in the worst place possibleergenomic wrote:It looks like they have successfully reverse engineered the Red Bull Monza wing left behind by Mark Webber at the Parabolica. I am referring to the Carbon Fibre layering technique to achieve flexibility of course; rather than the design of the wing itself. I read somewhere in the forum that half the front wing ended up with Ferrari.Francesc wrote:The 2012 wing is quite flexible
Wow, you have to wonder how much Ferrari really took from that wing in monza.raymondu999 wrote:Put it side by side like that those look absolutely identical
Maybe the "just copy it" talk in this forum have been taken too literallyamouzouris wrote:doesnt this make u think that this is the reason they were in such a rush to make it....this might not be their 2012 fw...maybe they just made a copy of the rbr front wing to test it...