https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/hond ... s/4351720/
LOOK LIKE IT REAL TEAMWORK
So far so good but:dsdevries wrote: ↑13 Mar 2019, 16:23The MGU-H is basically a dynamo positioned between the turbine and the compressor of the Turbocharger.
In a normal turbo the hot gasses from the exaust spin a turbine which is directly connected a compressor. That compressor compresses the intake air before it is injected into the cylinder. This compressed air will produce a more powerfull bang inside the cylinder and thus the engine has more power.
Is not quite right.
But, when the turbo spins while no power is needed by the engine, then all that energy is wasted. So the MGU-H will disengage the compressor and engages a dynamo which will charge the battery. That battery can power multiple things, but it is mainly used to spin the turbo at lower refs when the exaust gases alone are not powerfull enough. It is also used by the bobine to produce a more powerfull spark.
The MGU-H as the name implies harvests heat energy. The heat created by the combustion engine precisely. The turbine on a turbo "blocks" the expanding heated air that just left the combustion chamber, the energy left over after the engine has combusted its fuel drives the turbine. The MGU-H is connected to this turbine. The MGU-H is also connected to the compressor, the compressor feeds the engine with oxygen to be mixed with fuel so that combustion can take place. It's a very elegant loop, the MGU-H can not only drive the compressor, it can also slow it down, thus the MGU-H is an electric motor that regulates the speed of the turbo.
I think the efficiency @godlamerosa raised was conversion to electricity.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑13 Mar 2019, 20:58the rules don't allow the designer to spend fuel energy in the most race-efficient way but ....
they allow the designer to spend energy in the most race-efficient way after conversion of fuel energy to electrical energy
Who. I didn't realize it was that much. Should have done my calc. firstgruntguru wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 00:47For a compressor with 80% efficiency:Bandit1216 wrote: ↑11 Mar 2019, 09:40100 kW to drive the compressor can't be right. Oké, it's quite big and boost is high, but this just can't be true. That means you would need an ordinary 1.6 roadcar engine to drive the compressor wheel. I think someone added a zero.Mass flow (kg/s) MAP (bar abs) Compressor Power (kW) 0.5 3.0 69 0.67 4.0 122 0.83 5.0 181
Personally when thermal efficiencies are given for these power units I view it as the output energy rate in self sustaining mode measured at the crank divided by the input energy rate from the fuel.Gibbs wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 13:51Since we're on this topic about thermal efficiency and the MGU's, a friend and I were having a discussion about how the waste heat of the thermal efficiency would be affected by the electric motors. He argued that a standard thermal efficiency equation (using BSFC and a heating value) still held true for a V6 hybrid, as the work done by the motors was still the result of the fuel. My knowledge on the MGUH/K and ES and the sources of energy is very very primitive but as stated above the H and K are capable of extracting heat from the engine and utilising it as power, - and from my knowledge - also kinetic energy from the brakes and drivetrain(?).
My question is, does a standard thermal efficiency equation still hold true for the V6H, if some of the power being output by the electric motors is being generated by a source which is not fuel? And if so, how would the thermal efficiency be calculated or affected?
p.s sorry if everything I've said doesn't make sense, I'm still learning
Interesting how the cooling piping routes and their location in the radiators itself are so different in both teams. Different cooling packaging philosophies.HPD wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:55https://cdn-4.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... e-de-1.jpg
https://cdn-9.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... body-1.jpg
Aus FP2