feynman wrote:
One would hope, for an F1Technical site, that it shouldn't take long to figure out how teams could emulate, within the restrictions, a system of pseudo engine-braking.
one word - KERS
not sure engine braking per se is banned, it seems they limited some of the possibilties, the same goes for KERS, as KERS could be effectively turned into "brake by wire", but they put some restrictions in place, to limit the possibilities.
When the EBD became the new trend, engine braking was limited/not possible anyway, as the engine does not opperate with fully closed throttles anymore.
So the contribution of the engine, to the overall braking is reduced with the EBD.
Wood: What is the panel’s view on the effect of KERS on braking?
Hilton: The effect on braking is quite noticeable. Under the 2009 F1
KERS rules it is maybe 10% additional braking and it is maybe half a
second per lap from gaining time on the brakes. One of the effects,
though, is the manageability of that braking. You need to give the
driver a feel he’s comfortable with and that is always the same each
time he brakes. And that is quite a challenge.
Czapski: Probably the most outstanding thing about a Formula One
car is the braking. And it’s the thing most people don’t see: you don’t
notice it much on the TV unless someone has overtaken someone else.
If you can imagine your eyeballs popping out of your head pulling 6-G
peak – it’s quite a ferocious event. As Jon has said quite rightly, KERS
has a big percentage influence on that braking effort.
The regulations as they stand for next year leave us with a big
challenge because we’re not allowed to do what we would naturally do,
which would be to have brake by wire, so we can balance the system
correctly with the KERS requirement, with a stable charge of the battery,
with the driver’s braking requirement. I think the guys in the cockpit will
earn their money next year a bit more than they have done this year...
from
http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/wp- ... f/kers.pdf