The pit building foundation was also started more than 5 months ago. My post doesn't attempt to address pace of construction. It only concerns relative completion at a given point.Pup wrote:So had the India construction, and we're talking about the pit buildings. They were at similar stages at 10 and 5 months out respectively. Austin is ahead now. Ergo, Austin pit construction has progressed at more than twice the pace.
We've also seen photos with about the same amount of time left that show portions of Buddh's pit building topped. They also have concrete walls in place, hiding anything that might be inside.Pup wrote: We know because we've seen photos of ductwork, conduit, piping, and rooftop mechanical equipment in the Austin project. And since that work can only begin in sections that are topped out, we know that none of that work had begun in India.
So tell me then about all these other buildings that will be built in Austin.Pup wrote:Series vs parallel, as I discussed. And they weren't ahead as a whole.
In the google earth photo from Jan 16, the medical center is clearly visible exactly where it should be.Pup wrote:Those shacks with the laundry hanging on them are exactly where the medical center goes.
Pup wrote:Sorry, but you just don't get construction. I do this for a living, and I can tell you with certainty that the Austin grandstands will be farther along than India's in a few of weeks.
Pup wrote:It may well be hard for you to comprehend, but it is true nonetheless. The relative simplicity of the Austin facilities is in fact one of the reasons why, which I'd thought was too obvious to have to point out.
Wow. You really can't resist the odd nasty jab, can you?
Pup wrote: Again, the smaller scope is one of the reasons.
That "smaller scope" is newfound. The relative simplicity is a direct result of cuts made to catch up in the schedule and to save money. Of course any project could continually lop significant items off the plan when behind, then yell to the mountaintops "We're on schedule", just as you and COTA do.
There you go again. Throw out supposition after supposition, twist & torture them, and call them fact. Then call me a liar. You're nothing if not consistent.Pup wrote:But I think you know all of that, it just doesn't fit the story you want to tell.