Crucial_Xtreme wrote:donskar wrote:
Fry is the man in charge, if he is not sandbagging, and "somewhere" behind at least three other teams is the best he can do, then we'll soon be speculating on his replacement. I'll stick my neck WAY out and say we should keep our eyes on Ben Butler and Giorgio Ascanelli.
Frankly you have no idea what Fry is doing or isn't doing. Furthermore, his boss claims something completely different. Pat may very well have an
idea of where he
thinks the team is, but that doesn't make it
true. And Fry will not be fired or demoted should the F2012 be a failure this year. Mark my words.
Sure, I'll mark your words. I'll write them in water. OK?
BTW,
I didn't claim to know what Fry is doing or isn't doing.
Do you? I responded to his public statements.
Do you deny he said what is reported?
If you are Fry's boss, are you satisfied that Fry "may . . have an
idea of where he thinks the team is, but that doesn't make it
true?" I respect your passion for Ferrai and I share it (since the 1960's), but I ask you to put aside passion and think this through. Imagine a meeting between Fry and Domenicali or whoever his immediate superior might be. Boss says, "How are we doing on the exhaust situation?" Are you suggesting it would be perfectly all right for Fry to say "I think we'll have a solution in 3 weeks that will provide 15 points of down force. But I have no idea whether we really will."???
You say "his boss claims something completely different." I've been around long enough to know that when you and your boss publicly disagree, you better have your resume in order. Do you disagree with that?
BTW, I don't think Ferrari will fire Fry in the near term (
I certainly hope they do NOT fire him), but the team needs to work with their media people about messaging and PR. Being a little confused is OK. Making it public is NOT.
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill