The problems that caused Bahrain to be so bad will be present at other circuits too. Of course Jeddah will be fine because characteristics are so different.
Imola will be interesting to see what kinda difference it makes.ringo wrote: ↑14 Apr 2025, 01:35Max and his world of fans are overreacting.
One bad race and he came 6th? Not exactly a bad result. This should not be an emergency.
If it were Hamilton and his manager getting miserable and throwing a fit, he would be told to shutup and drive the car and apologize to F1 and the FIA.
I think this stroppiness is coming across rather entitled from Max and his fans. The world is not gonna end because a car that won 7 days ago convincingly came 6th this week because the conditions never suited it.
Redbull is the best place for Max to be right now. He has his the team eating out of his hand , a contractural #2 driver and car tailored for him every year. Going to another team without that bubble of dedicated and loyal people will make things worse for him.
The RB21 can be fixed and not everything is the car or team's fault. The driver who can "win with a tractor" couldnt win with one today. So he's also partly responsible for the setup direction that he took and not working the magic like his fans thinks he can.
He's gonna pole in Jeddah with the right setup and all will be right with the world again. RB21 just needs the right build up similar to what they did Suzuka and it's fast again.
Erik van Haren:
“In Japan, the pit stop was too slow by Red Bull standards.
They used the excuse that two important mechanics, twin brothers, had returned home before the race for family reasons.
But they were back in Bahrain.
At the first stop, the lights didn't work and stayed red for too long:
"But my second stop was even worse," Verstappen resigns.
Bring in James Allison, the savior Mercedes finally turned to, to get them out of the exact same situation.euv2 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2025, 08:52"The problems are known," Horner told RacingNews365, among others. "The solutions we see in our tools don't match the circuit. We have to find out. Why don't our tools match the circuit? And if you have to deal with such a problem, you have to undo it, of course. We have a strong technical team that has built some great cars over the last few years and I am confident that they will get to the bottom of this issue. Our tools simply don't match the track. Then you get to the point where you're turning two different watches."
Horner agrees that this problem was also reflected in 2024. "It's the same. The wind tunnel has sent us in a direction that doesn't show the same on the track. Then you end up with a mishmash between what your tools tell you and what the track data shows. Now we collect data on the track and that should lead to a solution. You have to understand your weaknesses. The problem is also that we are at the end of a set of regulations. Profit margins are marginal. We see shortcomings in our current wind tunnel'
https://racingnews365.nl/horner-verklaa ... l-probleem
Doesn't sound too promising sadly, that wind tunnel is a serious problem now. The poor correlation between WindTunnel and simulation tools has been very obvious, WT problems can be excused but the simulator itself they should have done a better job fixing ever since it showed problem in 23 with the kerbs and 24 with balance. MK wasted so much time by not giving them site permission but RBR should have been more proactive in replacing the wind tunnel. 2026 mid-season for a new wind tunnel but hey at least it will be state of the art then.
AMR says hivenkyhere wrote: ↑14 Apr 2025, 09:44Bring in James Allison, the savior Mercedes finally turned to, to get them out of the exact same situation.euv2 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2025, 08:52"The problems are known," Horner told RacingNews365, among others. "The solutions we see in our tools don't match the circuit. We have to find out. Why don't our tools match the circuit? And if you have to deal with such a problem, you have to undo it, of course. We have a strong technical team that has built some great cars over the last few years and I am confident that they will get to the bottom of this issue. Our tools simply don't match the track. Then you get to the point where you're turning two different watches."
Horner agrees that this problem was also reflected in 2024. "It's the same. The wind tunnel has sent us in a direction that doesn't show the same on the track. Then you end up with a mishmash between what your tools tell you and what the track data shows. Now we collect data on the track and that should lead to a solution. You have to understand your weaknesses. The problem is also that we are at the end of a set of regulations. Profit margins are marginal. We see shortcomings in our current wind tunnel'
https://racingnews365.nl/horner-verklaa ... l-probleem
Doesn't sound too promising sadly, that wind tunnel is a serious problem now. The poor correlation between WindTunnel and simulation tools has been very obvious, WT problems can be excused but the simulator itself they should have done a better job fixing ever since it showed problem in 23 with the kerbs and 24 with balance. MK wasted so much time by not giving them site permission but RBR should have been more proactive in replacing the wind tunnel. 2026 mid-season for a new wind tunnel but hey at least it will be state of the art then.
"No correlation" => developmental upgrade = 'random parts with different shape, can/cannot work'.
It's like having a highly precise 4 decimal place weighing machine, but with poor accuracy due to calibration being off kilter. 1kg will show up as 0.7895kg. A machine which shows 0.95 or 1.05 (less precise) is better, and that's what their 'FP session track data inspired 'overnight band aid work' is doing. Other teams are having tools showing 0.9950 or 1.0050 even before they arrive on track.
I think so too on the points. It is a miracle in this F1 season, that Norris and/or Piastri are not 30 points away already.Watto wrote: ↑14 Apr 2025, 02:41Imola will be interesting to see what kinda difference it makes.
I do think with Red Bulls issues to be as close to Lando as he is, Red Bull would have taken it to this point I though there was a real danger that by now they could have had a 30-40 point lead over Max. It that makes it more tricky - puts pressure on good results every week.
More the issue to me its, if Red Bulls tools, its CFD and wind tunnel can remedy the issues knowing them and having a solution that works can be 2 very different things. ....
And nefarious conspiracy seems more plausible?
Agree the season is very long, more than 500 points are still there for the taking. If we somehow manage to be within 30-40 points until Barcelona and the TD works in our favour+ working updates in Imola we have a small chance for the title. If not we know what will see, a new champion.basti313 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2025, 10:04I think so too on the points. It is a miracle in this F1 season, that Norris and/or Piastri are not 30 points away already.Watto wrote: ↑14 Apr 2025, 02:41Imola will be interesting to see what kinda difference it makes.
I do think with Red Bulls issues to be as close to Lando as he is, Red Bull would have taken it to this point I though there was a real danger that by now they could have had a 30-40 point lead over Max. It that makes it more tricky - puts pressure on good results every week.
More the issue to me its, if Red Bulls tools, its CFD and wind tunnel can remedy the issues knowing them and having a solution that works can be 2 very different things. ....
This is the straw...if the Imola update works, this may be an epic season. Especially with McLaren not deciding for a Nr1.
But the point on the tools is making this less likely. If they do not have any correlation, there will not be substantial improvement.