Kingshark wrote:When did I ever argue that Nico was better than Lewis in those races? I merely said that he was closer to Lewis in those weekends than he usually is.
you said he tends to perform best. im simply saying that its more likely down to other things than the tyres. i wasn't arguing with you.
Kingshark wrote:In Monaco, there was nothing to choose between the two on raw pace all weekend.
In Canada, Nico was just as fast as Lewis on super soft tyres. On the soft tyres, Lewis was a few tenths quicker, but not enough to pass on circuit.
In Austria, Lewis mucked up his own weekend. Likewise, in the final stint, he was no faster than Nico despite both being in clean air.
As for Germany, I'm inclined to say that Nico had better tyre life that race (like he did in Spain), although we never got to see a straight fight.
Canada and Germany you can't speak for because mechanical failures influenced the result. we will never know the true outcome without these.
Kingshark wrote:You don't get a much better overtaking opportunity than the Senna S. Lewis was slightly faster by a few tenths, but not enough to overtake. Catching is one thing, passing is something completely different.
Lewis was faster in s1 and s3. Being quicker in s2 was what saved nico.
You act like im trying to argue with you. I'm simply saying that its more coincidence. Not one of the those weekends were clean so its impossible to say. Monaco nico made a mistake and secured pole (no matter), then its impossible to overtake anyway. Lewis made an error in Austria, which is his fault, but again we will never know. Canada was effected by gremlins so we will never know and Germany lewis has brake failure - so again we will never know.
the situations favoured nico more but none of it was down to tyres. that's all im saying mate