...
EDIT wrong topic
go and troll somewhere else dude!lotus7 wrote:Is Schu also regarded as personnel ?donskar wrote:Assuming the MGP W01 does NOT have a miraculous improvement by the end of the season, Haug has set the stage for some personnel changes (from autosport.com):
Should after time not get the job done then you will change people," Haug added. "That's the name of the game for everybody.
Yes, but Audi won Le Mans this year not because of outright car performance, Peugeot cars was like 3 seconds a lap faster but all of them retired due the reliability reasons. Of course Le Mans is an endurance race and they deserved to win by having the best speed and reliability combination. If the Audi had the performance to match Peugeot they would have at least used it in qualifying laps even though they might not want to that speed in the race. I think last few years with Citroen in rallying, Renault in F1 and Peugeot in LeMans French manufacturers seem to do well....ggajic wrote: One of good examples of great German engineering is Audi R15+. Yes, they lost 24h LeMans in 2009. to Peugeot, but won 2010 race 1-2-3 back in style. And major improvement was in aerodynamics area. I am not saying that there are no good engineers all over Europe or in England where most F1 teams are located...
I simply took Audi of example how Germans are doing everything - always push 100% even if you are not best at least try to give your best. That is much what Schumacher has been doing through his all career and I have healthy respect for that kind of approach to job. I think that German football team also gives good insight into this kind of mental approach. And that is also approach I expect from Mercedes GP - not to sit in 4th and wait for Renault to overtake them in championship..LionKing wrote: Yes, but Audi won Le Mans this year not because of outright car performance, Peugeot cars was like 3 seconds a lap faster but all of them retired due the reliability reasons.
If Brawn was studying at UKAEA, then would he not be a physicist? His engineering degree is honorary, so therefore he is not an engineer. But then again, he hasn't taken any credit, or blame, for engineering the Merc or even the Brawn. These were designed by persons employed by him.mep wrote:I checked wiki and they both are engineers.
Pat Symonds was at Cranfield University.
Ross Brawn studied at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority in Harwell.
Later he received an honorary degree of Doctor of Engineering (DEng) from Brunel University for his services to motorsport.