Joe Saward is very naive.garrett wrote:[...]
Joe Saward recently explicitly said the new engines will not be postponed. I think he should know.
[...]
Joe Saward is very naive.garrett wrote:[...]
Joe Saward recently explicitly said the new engines will not be postponed. I think he should know.
[...]
Kindly elaborate on the first, how is this so precise?garrett wrote: ...
The rules concerning ERS and MGUH are very precisely to prevent any "arms race".
...
Joe Saward recently explicitly said the new engines will not be postponed. I think he should know.
...
And engine debris all over the track!Pierce89 wrote:with no restrictions, they'd probably go for super high revs AND a big honkin' turboaero expert 807 wrote:They would have 2 choices:bhallg2k wrote:What do you think teams could do with an otherwise unrestricted 0.5L engine?
A:] stick a HUGE turbo on it
which would mean huge lag
or
B:]revv the heck out of it
Which would be hard to make it reliable
overall a pretty hefty engineering challenge
½ liter??bhallg2k wrote:What do you think teams could do with an otherwise unrestricted 0.5L engine?
Yeah. My thought was that an engine with such a low displacement could probably be developed for a while before the FIA would inevitably deem it to be too powerful.strad wrote:½ liter??bhallg2k wrote:What do you think teams could do with an otherwise unrestricted 0.5L engine?
Don't know........strad wrote:What was that small twin that Ferrai played with? Back in the 50s I believe by Columbo.
Anybody recall that?
It was basically a 500mondial/750 Monza engine cut in half ,right? -I think it vibrated the dyno to pieces ,didn´t it?strad wrote:What was that small twin that Ferrai played with? Back in the 50s I believe by Columbo.
Anybody recall that?
oval pistons are sweet! Honda's old oval pistoned GP bike made one of the sweetest sounds ever heard.xpensive wrote:Naah, a 500 cc straight-four with twin balance-shafts, oval pistons, six-valve, twin-spark, compressor + turbo and 7 Bar boost.