I don't think any of the big teams would try to contract him anymore.slimfitcasual wrote:Evidently a multi year deal. I understand Nico wanting some stability but really? I suppose that won't matter if Ferrari comes knocking in a year or two.
Vettel left Torro Rosso after 1 season to a better team with Red Bull, Alonso left Manardi after 1 season to move to a better team in Red Bull, and Hamilton was already in arguably the best team when he entered F1.wesley123 wrote:I don't think any of the big teams would try to contract him anymore.slimfitcasual wrote:Evidently a multi year deal. I understand Nico wanting some stability but really? I suppose that won't matter if Ferrari comes knocking in a year or two.
Hulkenberg might be a bigger talent than Vettel, but he simply missed the boat on that one. Since his debut in F1 in 2010 he drove three seasons for three different teams. A rookie, or a beginning driver needs the stability to fully grow. Hulkenberg did not, instead opting for the best deal possible at the time. He pretty much threw away his learning platform for a better contract for a year, and really. Which of the WDC's have ever switched teams that fast? I cannot think of anyone. They all had multiple years at the same team. Alonso grew with Renault, Hamilton grew with McLaren, Vettel in the Toro Rosso and so on.
Hulkenberg missed the vital experience in a stable platform just to have the better car for the moment, and in my opinion pretty much handicapped his future while doing so.
Totally agree with you on this one Marcus. It's probably his biggest USP. By switching teams he might not have shown consistency regarding his drive, but whereever he went, he got the car to the max. A shame we didn't see him in the Lotus, I have little doubt he would have performed differently than Heikki.marcush. wrote:What is important -he has not taken any time to adapt integrate and deliver-we have heardof top pilots -namely Hamilton-who admitted to have trouble to adapt to the new team and the material ....Hulk jumps in and is there
Mclaren - Perez was on the podium a few times and he had money with him. Hulkenberg had neither.ScottB wrote:Is it not possible that the top teams just don't rate him that highly?
I mean, Mclaren could have went for him last year, or this year. I suppose it could be argued that Perez brought some money, but Magnussen definitely doesn't. Ferrari persevered with Massa, and favoured an aging Kimi.
I'm not saying he isn't good, he undoubtedly is, but perhaps the top teams don't believe him to be a future champion in waiting? Otherwise why haven't they signed him?